Interaction based, service oriented model of network architecture

Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electronica Sinica

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 804-809

  Yang, Peng ^a   Wu, Jia Gao ^a  

^a Ministry of Education   (China)

Author keywords

Component concept; Design principle; Network architecture; Next generation network; Tussle

Indexed keywords

COMPONENTS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLABILITY; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REUSABILITY;

COMPONENT CONCEPT; CUSTOMIZABILITY; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; EVOLVABILITY; FLEXIBILITY; FORMAL MODELING; MANAGEABILITY; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS; TUSSLE;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 22844445823     PISSN: 03722112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Clark D D, Wroclawski J, Sollins K R, et al. Tussle in Cyberspace: defining tomorrow's Internet[A]. Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM'02[C]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2002. 347-356.
2. El-Sayed A, Roca V, Mathy, L. A survey of proposals for an alternative group communication service[J]. IEEE Network, 2003, 17(1): 46-51.
3. Foster I, Kesselman C, Nick J, et al. Grid services for distributed system integration[J]. IEEE Computer, 2002, 35(6): 37-46.
4. Web Services Architecture Working Group. Web Services Architecture, W3C Working Draft 8[DB/OL]. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-ws-arch-20030808/wsa.pdf, 2003-12.
5. Carpenter B. Architectural Principles of the Internet[S]. RFC 1958, 1996.
6. Modarressi A R, Mohan S. Control and management in next-generation networks: Challenges and opportunities[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2000, 38(10): 94-102.
7. Clark D. A new vision for network architecture[EB/OL]. http://www.isi.edu/-braden/know-plane/DOCS/DDC_knowledgePlane_3.pdf, 2002.
8. Clark D D, Sollins K, Wroclawski J, et al. Addressing reality: an architectural response to real-world demands on the evolving Internet[J]. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2003, 33(4): 247-257.
9. ITU-T SG13. NGN 2004 Project description, Version 3[DB/OL]. http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/com13/ngn/9.html, 2004.
10. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB), National Research Council. Realizing the Information Future: The Internet and Beyond[M]. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1994.
11. Bocking S. Object-oriented network protocols[A]. Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM'97[C]. Kobe, Japan: IEEE, 1997. 1245-1252.
12. Allen R, Garlan D. A formal basis for architectural connection[J]. ACM Trans on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1997, 6(3): 213-249.
13. Medvidovic N, Taylor R N. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages[J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2000, 26(1): 70-93.
14. Clark D. The design philosophy of the DARPA Internet protocols[J]. Computer Communications Review, 1988, 18(4): 106-114.
15. Clark D D, Partridge C, Ramming J C, et al. A knowledge plane for the Internet[A]. Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM'03[C]. Karlsruhe, Germany, 2003. 3-10.
16. PlanetLab. http://www.planet-lab.org/, 2004.
17. Hoare C A R. Communicating Sequential Processes[M]. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, 1985.
18. Milner R. Elements of interaction[J]. Communication of the ACM, 1993, 36(1): 78-89.
19. Wegner P. Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1997, 40(5): 81-91.