No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 134-138

  Magni, G ^a,b   Baisi, F ^a   La Rosa, I ^a   Imperiale, C ^a   Fabbrini, V ^a   Pennacchiotti, M L ^a   Rosa, G ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b POLICLINICO UMBERTO I   (Italy)

Author keywords

Neuroanesthesia; Neurosurgery; Propofol; Remifentanil; Sevoflurane

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; SEVOFLURANE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; ARTICLE; BRADYCARDIA; BRAIN SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOTOMY; EXTUBATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYPOTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROSURGERY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHIVERING; TACHYCARDIA; VOMITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; COGNITION; CRANIOTOMY; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUPRATENTORIAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 22844441652     PISSN: 08984921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Talke P, Caldwell JE, Brown R, et al. A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:430-435.
2. Todd MM, Warner DS, Sokoll MD, et al. A prospective comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:1005-1020.
3. Gautier A, Girard F, Boudreault D, et al. Sevoflurane provides faster recovery and postoperative neurological assessment than isoflurane in long-duration neurosurgical cases. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1384-1388.
4. Bendo AA, Kass IS, Hartung J, et al. Anesthesia for neurosurgery. In: Barash PG et al (eds), Clinical Anesthesia. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2001:743-789.
5. Bedforth NM, Hardman JG, Nathanson MH. Cerebral hemodynamic response to the introduction of desflurane. A comparison with sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:152-155.
6. Strebel S, Lam AM, Matta B, et al. Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane and propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:66-76.
7. Hogue CW, Bowdle TA, O'Leary X, et al. A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:279-285.
8. Lerman J, Davis PJ, Welborn LG, et al. Induction, recovery and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery: A comparison with halothane. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:1332-1340.
9. Philip BK, Kallar SK, Bogetz MS, et al. The Sevoflurane Multicenter Ambulatory Group. A multicenter comparison of maintenance and recovery with sevoflurane or isoflurane for adult ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:314-319.
10. Wiesner G, Schwuerzer S, Hoerauf K, et al. Emergence time, haemodynamics and adverse effect of sevoflurane and isoflurane: A phase III, open label, randomized, comparative study. Anesthetist. 1994;43:587-593.
11. Larsen B, Seitz A, Larsen R. Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: A comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:168-174.
12. Tang J, Chen L, White PF, et al. Recovery profile, costs and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:253-261.
13. Ozkose Z, Ercan B, Unal Y, et al. Inhalation versus total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001;13:293-302.
14. Roberts FL, Dixon J, Lewis GTR, et al. Induction and maintenance of propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1998;43(suppl):14-17.
15. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, et al. Validation of a Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140:734-739.
16. Thomeé R, Grimby G, Wrigth BD, et al. Rasch analysis of Visual Analog Scale measurements before and after treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome in women. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:145-151.
17. Rosa G, Pinto G, De Blasi RA, et al. Control of post anaesthetic shivering with nefopam hydrochloride in mildly hypothermic patients after neurosurgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39:90-95.
18. Chen X, Zhao M, White PF, et al. The recovery of cognitive function after general anesthesia in elderly patients: A comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1489-1494.
19. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ, et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:514-524.
20. Basali A, Masha EJ, Kalfas I, et al. Relation between perioperative hypertension and intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:48-54.
21. Kuroda K, Skyhoij OT, Lassen NA. Regional cerebral blood flow in various types of brain tumor: Effect of the space-occupying lesion on blood flow in brain tissue close to and remote from tumor site. Acta Neurol Scand. 1982;66:160-171.
22. Alexander SC, Lassen NA. Cerebral circulatory response to acute brain disease: Implications for anesthetic practice. Anesthesiology. 1970;32:60-68.
23. Fieschi C, Agnoli A, Battistini N, et al. Derangement of regional cerebral blood flow and of its regulatory mechanisms in acute cerebrovascular lesions. Neurology. 1968;18:1166-1179.
24. Skinhoy E, Strandgaard S. Pathogenesis of hypertensive encephalopathy. Lancet. 1973;1:461-462.
25. Strandgaard S, Mackenzie ET, Sengupta D, et al. Upper limit of autoregulation of cerebral flow in the baboon. Circ Res. 1974;34:435-440.
26. Vuyk J, Nerteens MJ, Olofsen E, et al. Propofol anesthesia and rationale opioid selection: Determination of optimal EC50-95 propofol-opioid concentration that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1549-1562.
27. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Short TG, et al. Response surface model for anesthetic drug interaction. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1603-1616.