Influence of wild oat (Avena fatua) relative time of emergence and density on cultivated oat yield, wild oat seed production, and wild oat contamination

Weed Science

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 342-352

  Willenborg, Christian J ^a   May, William E ^b   Gulden, Robert H ^c   Lafond, Guy P ^b   Shirtliffe, Steven J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competition; Interference; Time of emergence; Weed density; Yield loss

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MODELING; CROP YIELD; EMERGENCE; INTERFERENCE COMPETITION; POPULATION DENSITY; SEED PRODUCTION; WEED; YIELD RESPONSE;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; SASKATCHEWAN;

AVENA FATUA; AVENA SATIVA;

EID: 22844436012     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-04-124R1     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Acton, D. F., G. A. Padbury, and C. T. Stushnoff. 1998. The Ecoregions of Saskatchewan. Winnipeg, MB: Hignell. Pp. 125-156.
2. Bell, A. R. and J. D. Nalewaja. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:509-512.
3. Bosnie, A. C. and C. J. Swanton. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45:276-282.
4. Carlson, H. L. and J. E. Hill. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176-181.
5. Chancellor, R. J. 1976. Seed Behavior. Pages 65-98 in D. Price Jones, ed. Wild oat in World Agriculture. London, UK: Agricultural Research Council.
6. Chang, J. 1968. Climate and Agriculture: An Ecological Survey. Chicago, IL: Aldine. 290 p.
7. Chikoye, D., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 43:375-380.
8. Cousens, R., P. Brain, J. T. O'Donovan, and P. A. O'Sullivan. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35:720-725.
9. Dieleman, A., A. S. Hamill, S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Empirical models of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:612-618.
10. Environment Canada. 2004. Canadian Climate Normals 1971 to 2000. www.mscsmc.ee.gc.ca/climate/climate_normals/show_normals_e. cfm?station_id= 1473prov=SK.
11. FAOSTAT. 2004. Data Collections-Agricultural Production. http://faostat. fao.org/faostat/collections?subset=agriculture.
12. Jasieniuk, M., B. D. Maxwell, R. L. Anderson, et al. 1999. Site-to-site and year-to-year variation in Triticum aestivum-Aegilops cylindrica interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:529-537.
13. Juskiw, P. E. and J. H. Helm. 2003. Barley response to seeding date in central Alberta. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 83:275-281.
14. Kirkland, K. J. 1993. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth and yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) competition. Weed Technol. 7:890-893-
15. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Sci. 42:568-573.
16. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207-214.
17. Koutsoyiannis, A. 1973. Theory of Econometrics: An Introductory Exposition of Econometric Methods. London: MacMillan. Pp. 68-95.
18. Kropff, M. J. and C.J.T. Spitters. 1991. A simple model of crop yield loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 31:97-105.
19. Lafond, G. P. and R. J. Baker. 1986. Effects of temperature, moisture stress, and seed size on germination of nine spring wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 26:563-567.
20. Leeson, J. Y., A. G. Thomas, T. Andrews, K. Brown, and R. C. Van Acker. 2002a. 2002 Manitoba Weed Survey of Cereal, Oilseed, and Pulse Crops. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publ. 02-2. 141 p.
21. Leeson, J. Y., A. G. Thomas, and C. Brenzil. 2003. 2003 Saskatchewan Weed Survey of Cereal, Oilseed, and Pulse Crops. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publ. 03-1. 342 p.
22. Leeson, J. Y., A. G. Thomas, and L. M. Hall. 2002b. 2001 Alberta Weed Survey of Cereal, Oilseed, and Pulse Crops. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publ. 02-1. 263 p.
23. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, S. A. Clay, R. Schmenk, J. J. Kells, K. Howatt, and P. Westra. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309-313.
24. Manitoba Agriculture. 2002. Pest Management-Weeds-Wild oat. www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/fab19s00.html.
25. Martin, M.P.L.D. and R. J. Field. 1988. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res. 28:111-116.
26. Martin, R. J., B. R. Cullis, and D. W. McNamara. 1987. Prediction of wheat yield loss due to competition by wild oats (Avena spp.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38:487-499-
27. May, W. E., R. M. Mohr, G. P. Lafond, A. M. Johnston, and F. C. Stevenson. 2004. Early seeding dates improve oat yield and quality in the eastern prairies. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84:431-442.
28. O'Donovan, J. T, E. A. de St. Remy, P. A. O'Sullivan, D. A. Dew, and A. K. Sharma. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498-503.
29. O'Donovan, J. T., K. N. Harker, G. W. Clayton, and L. M. Hall. 2000. Wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in barley (Hordeum vulgare) is influenced by barley variety and seeding rate. Weed Technol. 14:624-629.
30. O'Donovan, J. T., J. C. Newman, K. N. Harker, R. E. Blackshaw, and D. W. McAndrew. 1999. Effect of barley plant density on wild oat interference, shoot biomass, and seed yield under zero tillage. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79:655-662.
31. Peters, N.C.B. and B. J. Wilson. 1983. Some studies on the competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. II. Variation of A. fatua emergence and development and its influence on crop yield. Weed Res. 23:305-311.
32. Ratkowsky, D. A. 1983. Nonlinear Regression Modeling: A Unified Practical Approach. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 135-154.
33. Rolston, M. P. 1981. Wild oat in New Zealand: a review. N. Z. J. Exp. Agric. 9:115-121.
34. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1996. SAS User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.
35. Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food, and Rural Revitalization. 2004. 2003 Saskatchewan Crop District Crop Production, www.agr.gov.sk.ca/docs/statistics/ crops/production/SkCrpDistrict03.pdf.
36. Schabenberger, O. and F. J. Pierce. 2002. Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. New York: CRC. Pp. 183-298.
37. Seavers, G. P. and K. J. Wright. 1999. Crop canopy development and structure influence weed suppression. Weed Res. 39:319-328.
38. Sharma, M. P., D. K. McBeath, and W. H. Vanden Born. 1976. Studies of on the biology of wild oat. 1. Dormancy, germination, and emergence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:611-618.
39. Sharma, M. P. and W. H. Vanden Born. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds-Avena fatua. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 58:141-157.
40. Shirtliffe, S. J., M. H. Entz, and R. C. Van Acker. 2000. Avena fatua development and seed shatter as related to thermal time. Weed Sci. 48:555-560.
41. Statistics Canada. 2004. Census of Agriculture-Historical Data. www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/econ126a.html.
42. Weaver, S. 2003. Correlations among relative crop and weed growth stages. Weed Sci. 51:163-170.
43. Wildeman, J. C. 2004. The Effect of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotype and Seeding Rate on Wild Oat (Avenu fatua L.) Competition. Masters thesis. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. 103 p.
44. Zadoks, J. C., T. T. Chang, and C. F. Konzak. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415-421.