Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: A 14-year follow-up study

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 767-772

  Kjølhede, Preben ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Burch colposuspension; Cure rate; Long term follow up; Risk factor; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COLPOSUSPENSION; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; IMPAIRED BLADDER EMPTYING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBESITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; URETHRA; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADULT; AGED; COLPOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL MESH; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 22844435203     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00731.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Eriksen BC, Hagen B, Eik-Nes SH, Molne K, Mjølnerød OK, Romslo I. Long-term effectiveness of the Burch colposuspension in female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 45-50.
2. Feyereisl J, Dreher E, Haenggi W, Zikmund J, Schneider H. Long-term results after Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 647-52.
3. Kjølhede P, Rydén G. Prognostic factors and long-term results of the Burch colposuspension. A retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 642-7.
4. Awad SA, Flood HD, Acker KL. The significance of prior anti-incontinence surgery in women who present with urinary incontinence. J Urol 1988; 140: 514-7.
5. Jarvis GJ. Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 371-4.
6. Black NA, Downs SH. The effectiveness of surgery for stress incontinence in women: a systematic review. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 497-510.
7. Lose G, Jørgensen L, Mortensen SO, Mølsted-Pedersen L, Kristensen JK. Voiding difficulties after colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 33-8.
8. Wall LL, Hewitt JK. Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence. J Reprod Med 1996; 41: 161-5.
9. Kjølhede P. Genital prolapse in women treated successfully and unsuccessfully by the Burch colposuspension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 444-50.
10. Wiskind AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL. The incidence of genital prolapse after the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 399-404.
11. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL. Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 740-5.
12. Bergman A, Elia G. Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 66-71.
13. Dietz HP, Wilson PD. Colposuspension success and failure: a long-term objective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11: 346-51.
14. Uustal FE, Wingren G, Kjølhede P. Prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence and symptoms of genital prolapse in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 280-6.
15. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R. Surgical approaches to obtaining optimal bowel function. Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 18: 249-58.
16. Kauppila A, Alavaikko P, Kujansuu E. Detrusor instability score in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 137-41.
17. Tegerstedt G, Sjöberg B, Hammarström M. Clinical outcome or abdominal urethropexy-colposuspension: a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12: 161-5.
18. Bombier L, Freeman RM, Perkins EP, Williams MP, Shaw SR. Why do women have voiding dysfunction and de novo detrusor instability after colposuspension? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 402-12.
19. Sand PK, Bowen LW, Ostergard DR, Brubaker L, Panganiban R. The effect of retropubic urethropexy on detrusor stability. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 818-22.
20. Kwon CH, Culligan PJ, Koduri S, Goldberg RP, Sand PK. The development of pelvic organ prolapse following isolated Burch retropubic urethropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003; 14: 321-5.
21. Drouin J, Tessier J, Bertrand PE, Schick E. Burch colposuspension: long-term results and review of published reports. Urology 1999; 54: 808-14.
22. Meltomaa SS, Haarala MA, Taalikka MO, Kiilholma PJ, Alanen A, Makinen JI. Outcome of Burch retropubic urethropexy and the effect of concomitant abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001; 12: 3-8.
23. Parys BT, Haylen BT, Hutton JL, Parsons KF. Urodynamic evaluation of lower urinary tract function in relation to total hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 30: 161-5.
24. Benson JT, McClellan E. The effect of vaginal dissection on the pudendal nerve. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 387-9.
25. Kinn AC. Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. 5-year results in 153 women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995; 29: 449-55.
26. Gillon G, Stanton SL. Long-term follow-up of surgery for urinary incontinence in elderly women. Br J Urol 1984; 56: 478-81.
27. Brieger G, Korda A. The effect of obesity on the outcome of successful surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 32: 71-2.
28. Zivkovic F, Tamussino K, Pieber D, Haas J. Body mass index and outcome of incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 753-6.