Physiology in daily hemodialysis in terms of the time average concentration/time average deviation concept

Hemodialysis International

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-44

  Lopot, Frantisek ^a   Nejedlý, Bohdan ^a   Sulková, Sylvie ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Daily dialysis; Dialysis "unphysiology"; Time average concentration; Time average deviation

Indexed keywords

UREA;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAFILTRATION; DIALYSIS MEMBRANE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOLUTE; TIME; TREATMENT PLANNING; ULTRAFILTRATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL;

EID: 22744450200     PISSN: 14927535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1492-7535.2004.00073.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lopot F, Válek A. Time-averaged concentration-time-averaged deviation: A new concept in mathematical assessment of dialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1989; 3:846-848.
2. Lopot F, Válek A. Mathematical concept of dialysis unphysiology. Home Hemodial Int. 1998; 2:18-21.
3. Sargent JA. Control of dialysis by a single pool model. The National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int. 1983; 23(suppl 13):19-25.
4. Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 1985; 28:526-534.
5. Babb AL, Strand MJ, Uvelli DA, Milutinovic J, Scribner BH. Quantitative description of dialysis treatment, A dialysis Index. Kidney Int. 1975; 7(suppl 2):23-29.
6. Kovacis V, Roguljic L, Jukis I, Kovacic V. Comparison of methods for hemodialysis dose calculation. Dial Transplant. 2003; 32:170-178.
7. Casino FG, Lopez T. The equivalent renal urea clearance: A new parameter to assess dialysis dose. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996; 11:1574-1581.
8. Casino FG. The EKR graph: A simple method to estimate the time-averaged urea clearance. Semin Dial. 1999; 12:11-14.
9. Gotch F. Dialysis dose model to compare and quantify combined continuous and intermittent dialysis of various frequencies and variable rates. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998; 13(suppl 6):10-14.
10. De Wachter DS, Brems S, Vanholder R, Verdonck PR, Hombrouckx RO. Predialysis urea concentration is sufficient to characterize hemodialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Artif Int Organs. 1998; 44:670-676.
11. Kjellstrand CM, Evans RL, Petersen RJ, Shideman JR, von Hartitzsch B, Buselmeier TJ. The 'unphysiology' of dialysis: A major cause of dialysis side effects? Kidney Int Suppl. 1975; Jan:30-34.
12. Galland R, Traeger J, Delawari E, Arkouche W, Abdullah E. Daily hemodialysis vs. standard hemodialysis. TAC, TAD, Weekly eKT/V, Std (KT/V), and nPCR. Home Hemodial Int. 1999; 3:33-36.
13. Lindsay RM, Spanner E. A hypothesis: The protein catabolic rate is dependent upon the type and amount of treatment in dialyzed uremic patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1989; 13:383-389.
14. Lindsay RM, Spanner E, Heidenheim RP, Lefebre JM, Hodsman A, Baird J, Allison MEM. Which comes first Kt/V or PCR - Chicken or egg? Kidney Int Suppl. 1992; 38:S32-S36.
15. Schulman G. Nutrition in daily hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 41(3 suppl 1):112-115.
16. Lopot F, Kotyk P, Bláha J, Válek A. Analysis of the urea generation rate and the protein catabolic rate in hemodialyzed patients. Artif Organs. 1995; 19: 832-836.
17. Stragier A, Jadoul M. Daily weight gain and protein catabolic rate are lower over the long interdialytic interval. Clin Nephrol. 2003; 60:22-27.
18. Scribner GH, Oreopoulos DG. The hemodialysis product (HDP): A better index of dialysis adequacy than Kt/V. Dial Transplant. 2002; 31:13-15.
19. Babb AL, Popovich R, Christopher TG. The genesis of square meter-hour hypothesis. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs. 1971; 17:81-83.
20. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Lysaght MJ, McCarthy JT, Moran J. Kinetics and dosing predictions for daily haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18:769-776.