Protecting science from abuse requires a broader form of outreach

PLoS Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1177-1178

  Chan, Kai M A ^a   Higgins, Paul A T ^b   Porder, Stephen ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; CHROMOSOME; E-MAIL; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; INHERITANCE; LITERATURE; POLICY; POLITICS; SHORT SURVEY; ARTICLE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE;

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS;

COMMUNICATION; POLITICS; SCIENCE;

EID: 22744440940     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030218     Document Type: Short Survey

References (12)

1. Union of Concerned Scientists (2004) Scientific integrity in policy making: Further investigation of the Bush administration's misuse of science. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Union of Concerned Scientists. 34 p.
2. Union of Concerned Scientists (2004) Scientific integrity in policy making: An investigation into the Bush administration's misuse of science. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Union of Concerned Scientists. 49 p.
3. United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform-Minority Staff (2003) Politics and science in the Bush administration. Washington (District of Columbia). 39 p.
4. Waxman HA (2005) Politics and science: Investigating the state of science under the Bush administration. Available: http://democrats.reform.house.gov/ features/ politics_and_science/index.htm. Accessed 12 May 2005.
5. Chan KMA, Porder S, Higgins PAT, Kramer SB (2004) Concern is more than just 'ruffled feathers': If a government abuses science to justify its policies, scientists have a duty to speak out. Nature 428: 255.
6. Porder S, Chan KMA, Higgins PAT (2004) Scientists must conquer reluctance to speak out: When science is under political assault, keeping a dignified silence is counterproductive. Nature 431: 1036.
7. Higgins PAT (2004) The Bush administration and climate change. Science 306: 2041.
8. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (2005) Preserving core values in science. Washington (District of Columbia): Association of Reproductive Health Professionals.
9. Marincola E (2003) Research advocacy: Why every scientist should participate. PLoS Biol 1: e71. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000071
10. Reid WV (2004) Bridging the science-policy divide. PLoS Biol 2: e27. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pbio.0020027
11. Diamond JM (2004) Lessons from environmental collapses of past societies. Washington (District of Columbia): National Council for Science and the Environment. 29 p.
12. Schlesinger WH (2003) Scientists must boldly address important environmental issues. The Herald Sun (Durham); Sect A: 13.