Ceramic inserts do not generally improve resin composite margins

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 606-613

  Strobel, W O ^a   Petschelt, A ^a   Kemmoona, M ^b   Frankenberger, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Ceramic inserts; Dentine; Enamel; Polymerization shrinkage; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR;

EID: 22744433656     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01459.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct class II composite restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:127-138.
2. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1979;58:1093-1096.
3. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2000;13:25D-33D.
4. Eberhard J, Dörfer C, Staehle HJ. Effects of the application technique on proximal contact strength of composite restorations in vitro. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1996;51:184 (abstract in English).
5. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3:11-17.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 1998;26:1-20.
7. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status an future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215-235.
8. Haase SL. An innovative approach to Class II preparation and restoration. Sig. 1998;5:16-19.
9. Donly KL, Wild TW, Bowen RL, Jensen ME. An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1234-1237.
10. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Inserts - megafillers in composite restorations: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4:1-4.
11. George LA, Richards ND, Eichmiller FC. Reduction of marginal gaps in composite restorations by use of glassceramic inserts. Oper Dent. 1995;20:151-154.
12. Tani Y, Nambu T, Ishikawa A, Katsuyama S. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction force of composite resin restorative inserts with "Megafillers". Dent Mater J. 1993;12:182-189.
13. Bott B, Hannig M. Optimizing Class II composite resin esthetic restorations by use of ceramic inserts. J Esthet Dent. 1995;7:110-117.
14. Bott B, Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater J. 2003;19:264-269.
15. Özcan M, Pfeiffer P, Nergiz I. Marginal adaptation of ceramic inserts after cementation. Oper Dent. 2002;27:132-136.
16. Odman P, Nilsson E, Pietruszka K. Cerana - a new method for restoration of teeth with prefabricated ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:340-347.
17. Rada RE. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta quartz glass-ceramic inserts. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:793.
18. Sjögren G, Hedlund SO, Jonsson C, Sandstrom A. A 3-year follow-up study of performed beta-quartz glass ceramic insert restorations. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:25-31.
19. Millar BJ. Cerana - a direct ceramic inlay technique. Prim Dent Care 1999;6:59-62.
20. Worm DA Jr, Meiers JC. Effect of various types of contamination on mikroleakage between beta-quartz inserts and resin composite. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:271-277.
21. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Pelka M. Bond strengths of glass ceramic inserts to resin composite. Dtsch Zahnärtzl Z. 1998;53:139-142 (abstract in English).
22. Matos AB, Kuramoto M Jr, Powers JM, Eduardo CD. Bond strength of a resin-based composite to leucite-reinforced ceramic and dentin. Am J Dent. 1999;12:113-115.
23. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noak MJ. Marginal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites. J Dent. 2003;31:231-239.
24. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater J. 2004;20:191-197.
25. Haller B, Hassner K, Moll K. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites. Oper Dent. 2003;28:574-584.
26. Frankenberger R, Roth S, Krämer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Effect of preparation mode on Class II resin composite repair. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:559-564.
27. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A. The effect of six years water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;69:25-32.
28. Hahn P, Schaller HG, Müllner U, Hellwig E. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:567-574.
29. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of glass inserts on resin composite wear. Am J Dent. 1995;8:249-252.
30. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS-Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent. 1999;27:325-331.
31. Bowen RL, George LA, Eichmiller FC, Misra DN. An esthetic glass ceramic for use in composite restoration inserts. Dent Mater J. 1993;9:290-294.
32. El-Badrawy WA, Leung BW, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH, Rubo MH. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:162-167.
33. Hugo B, Otto A, Stassinakis A, Hofmann N, Klaiber B. A retrospective in vivo study of SonicSys approx restorations. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2001;111:152-158.
34. Odman P. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Cerana prefabricated ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:79-82.
35. Godder B, Zhukovsky L, Trushkowsky R, Epelboym D. Microleakage reduction using glassceramic inserts. Am J Dent. 1994;7:74-76.
36. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bilici S. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glassceramic inserts. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:725-729.
37. Kuramoto M Jr, Matos AB, Matson E, Eduardo CP, Powers JM. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations with ceramic inserts. Am J Dent. 2000;13:311-314.
38. Liebenberg WH. Controlling contacts and contours using preformed ceramic inserts. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:147-150, 152, 154-156 passim quiz 168.