A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 95, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages

  Lakoff, George P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Rockridge Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; JUSTICE; LAW SUIT; LEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; MORTALITY; POLITICS; REVIEW; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

COGNITIVE SCIENCE; DRUG INDUSTRY; EXPERT TESTIMONY; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; METAPHOR; MORALS; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 22744433547     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044552     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. For more on the methods of cognitive analysis using cognitive linguistics, see Fauconnier G, Turner M. The Way We Think New York: Basic Books, 2002;
2. Lakoff G, Turner M. More Than Cool Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989;
3. Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems and Volume 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000;
4. Reddy M. The conduit metaphor, In Metaphor and Thought, edited by A. Ortony, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979:284-324;
5. Boroditsky L. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 2000; 75(1):1-28;
6. Sweetser E. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990;
7. Johnson C. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. In Cultural, Typological and Psychological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, edited by Hiraga HK, Sinha C, Wilcox S. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997; 155-169;
8. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987;
9. Johnson M. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993;
10. Fillmore C. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 1985; 6:222-253;
11. and Grady J. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1997.
12. See Gibbs R. The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994;
13. Johnson M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987;
14. Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 1998; 21:188-194;
15. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 1996; 3:131-141;
16. Regier T. The Human Semantic Potential Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996;
17. Narayanan S. Embodiment in Language Understanding: Sensory-Motor Representations for Metaphoric Reasoning about Event Descriptions. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1997;
18. Narayanan S. Talking the talk is like walking the walk: A computational model of verbal aspect. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Stanford University, August 7-10, 1997;
19. Lewis D. Causation. Journal of Philosophy 1973; 70:556-567;
20. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 1999; 286:2526-2528;
21. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
22. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
23. Lakoff G, Núñez R. Where Mathematics Comes From. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
24. Hart HLA, Honoré AM. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1959:26.
25. For a detailed discussion of metaphor and modes of causal reasoning, see Lakoff G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
26. Vidmar N. The performance of the American civil jury: An empirical perspective. Arizona Law Review 1998; 40:849-899.
27. Lowell Statement on Science and The Precautionary Principle. Available from: http://sustainableproduction. org/precaution. Accessed May 20, 2005.
28. Lakoff G. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.