A framework for assessment of ecological risks from multiple activities

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 397-413

  Suter II, Glenn W ^a,b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Framework; Integrated assessment; Multistressor; Programmatic assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 22644449101     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807039991289509     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barnthouse, L.W., and Suter, G.W., II. 1986. User's manual for ecological risk assessment. ORNL-6251. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
2. Barnthouse, L.W., Suter, G.W., II., and Rosen, A.E. 1990. Risks of toxic contaminants to exploited fish populations: Influence of life history, data uncertainty, and exploitation intensity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 9, 297-311.
3. Beanlands, G. E. et al. 1985. Cumulative Environmental Effects: A Binational Perspective. No. EN 106-2/1985. Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
4. Bedford, B.L., and E.M. Preston. 1988. Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands. Environ. Manage., 12(5), 751-771.
5. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., deGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260.
6. Finney, D.J. 1964. Statistical Methods in Biological Assay. Griffin Press, London.
7. Hewlett, P.S., and Plackett, R.L. 1979. The Interpretation of Quantal Responses in Biology. Edward Arnold, London.
8. Leslie, M., Meffe, G.K, Hardesty, J.L., and Adams, D.L. 1996. Conserving biodiversity on military lands: A handbook for natural resource managers. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
9. Menzie, C.A., and Freshman, J.S. 1997. An assessment of the risk assessment paradigm for ecological risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 3(5), 853-892.
10. NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
11. NRC (National Research Council). 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
12. Peterson, E.B., Chan, Y.-H., Peterson, N.M., Constable, G.A., Caton, R.B., Davis, C.S., Wallace, R.R., and Yarranton, G.A. 1987. Cumulative effects assessment in Canada: An agenda for action and research. Cat. No. EN106-7/1987E. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa.
13. Rose, K. A., Cowan, J.H., Houde, E.D., and Coutant, C.C. 1993. Individual-based modeling of environmental quality effects on early life-stages of fishes: a case study using striped bass. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 14, 125-145.
14. Science Policy Council. 1997. Guidance on Cumulative Risk Assessment. Part 1. Planning and Scoping, http://www.epa.gov/ord/spc/cumrisk2.htm. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
15. Suter, G.W., II. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Suter, G.W., II. 1995. Guide for performing screening ecological risk assessments at DOE facilities. ES/ER/TM-153. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN.
17. Suter, G.W., II. 1999. Developing conceptual models for complex ecological risk assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5(2): 375-396.
18. Suter, G.W., II. 1998. Retrospective assessment, ecoepidemiology, and ecological monitoring. pp. 177-217. (P. Calow, Ed.). Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management.Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
19. Suter, G.W., II, Gillett, J.W., and S. Norton. 1994. Characterization of exposure. Ch. 4. Ecological Risk Assessment Issue Papers. EPA/630/R-94/009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
20. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, D.C.
21. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, D.C.