Without appointed counsel in capital postconviction proceedings - The self-representation competency of Mississippi death row inmates

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 293-321

  Cunningham, Mark D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22644448654     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854899026003002     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.) New York: Macmillan.
2. Anti-Drag Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. §§828 (q)(5), (q)(6) (1988 ed.).
3. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006 (1972).
4. Bateman, R. B. (1994). Federal and state perspectives on a criminal defendant's right to self representation. Journal of Contemporary Law, 20, 77-132.
5. Beck, A., Gilliard, D., Greenfeld, L., Harlow, C., Hester, T., Jankowski, L., Snell, T., Stephan, J., & Morton, D. (1993). Survey of state prison inmates, 1991 (NCJ-136949). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
6. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792 (1963).
7. Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. (1993).
8. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956).
9. Grisso, T. ( 1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum.