Improved speech perception in adult congenitally deafened cochlear implant recipients

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 649-654

  Moody Antonio, Stephanie ^a,d   Takayanagi, Sumiko ^b   Masuda, Ann ^b   Auer Jr , Edward T ^b   Fisher, Laurel ^b   Bernstein, Lynne E ^b,c  

^a EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^d Hofheimer Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Adults; Cochlear implants; Deafness; Lipreading; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIP READING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECIPIENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL STIMULATION; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; HEARING; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 22644433423     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000178124.13118.76     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Zwolan TA, Kileny PR, Telian SA. Self-report of cochlear implant use and satisfaction by prelingually deafened adults. Ear Hear 1996;17:198-210.
2. Chute PM. Cochlear implants in adolescents. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1993;48:210-5.
3. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population. Laryngoscope 1992;102:395-9.
4. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Implantation of patients with prelingual long-term deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1999;177: 84-7.
5. Skinner MW, Binzer SM, Fears BT, et al. Study of the performance of four prelinguistically or perilinguistically deaf patients with a multi-electrode, intracochlear implant. Laryngoscope 1992;102: 797-806.
6. Manrique N, Huarte A, Molina M, et al. Are cochlear implants indicated in prelingually deaf adults? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:192-4.
7. Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr, Cohen NL. Delayed implantation in congenitally deaf children and adults. Otol Neurotol 2002;23: 333-40.
8. Schramm D, Fitzpatrick E, Seguin C. Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:698-703.
9. Bernstein LE, Demorest ME, Tucker PE. Speech perception without hearing. Percept Psychophys 2000;62:233-52.
10. Tyler RS, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay DM, et al. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:180-7.
11. Bernstein LE, Eberhardt SP. Johns Hopkins Lipreading Corpus III-IV. Disc 2 [videodisk]. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1986.
12. Bernstein L, Eberhardt SP. Hopkins Lipreading Corpus I-II. Disc 1 [videodisk]. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1986.
13. Davis H, Silverman SR. Hearing and Deafness. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1970.
14. IEEE. IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 1969.
15. Lachs L, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI. Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report. Ear Hear 2001;22:236-51.
16. Eisenberg LS. Use of the cochlear implant by the prelingually deaf. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982;91:62-6.
17. Walden BE, Grant KW, Cord MT. Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing. Ear Hear 2001;22:333-41.
18. Walden BE, Busacco DA, Montgomery AA. Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:431-6.
19. Massaro DW, Cohen MM. Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;42:21-41.
20. Goh WD, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI, et al. Audio-visual perception of sinewave speech in an adult cochlear implant user: a case study. Ear Hear 2001;22:412-9.
21. Rabinowitz WM, Eddington DK, Delhorne LA, et al. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;92:1869-81.
22. Giraud AL, Truy E. The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implants patients and normal-hearing subjects. Neuropsychologia 2002;40:1562-9.
23. Grant KW, Walden BE, Seitz PF. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:2677-90.
24. Watson CS, Qiu WW, Chamberlain MM, et al. Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:1153-62.
25. Pisoni DB. Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception. Ear Hear 2000;21:70-8.