Superluminal hidden communication as the underlying mechanism for quantum correlations: Constraining models

Brazilian Journal of Physics

Volumn 35, Issue 2 A, 2005, Pages 328-332

  Scarani, Valerio ^a   Gisin, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544487521     PISSN: 01039733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0103-97332005000200018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. For some examples, see: S.L. Adler, Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004);
2. G. 'tHooft, quant-ph/0212095;
3. F. Markopoulou, L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124029 (2004).
4. A. Einstein, B. Podolski, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)
5. J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected papers on quantum philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987)
6. D. Bohm, B.J. Hiley, The undivided universe (Routledge, New York, 1993)
7. Ph. Eberhard, A Realistic Model for Quantum Theory with a Locality Property, in: W. Schommers (ed.), Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality (Springer, Berlin, 1989)
8. T. Durt, Helv. Phys. Acta 72, 356 (1999)
9. A. Suarez, V. Scarani, Phys. Lett. A 232, 9 (1997).
10. This model was also ruled out by experiment: H. Zbinden, J. Brendel, N. Gisin, and W. Tittel, Phys. Rev. A 63, 022111 (2001);
11. A. Stefanov, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, and A. Suarez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 120404 (2002)
12. V. Scarani, N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 295, 167 (2002)
13. Experimental lower bounds for this speed have been presented in: V. Scarani, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 276, 1 (2000)
14. One might ask why the no-signaling condition should be enforced if we assume a preferred frame for quantum phenomena. Indeed, there is no longer a fundamental reason for that requirement. Still, classical events seem to be conveniently described using special relativity; and the record of a detection is a classical events that can be precisely located in space-time.
15. N. Linden, W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 277906 (2002)
16. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
17. To compute the maximal violation and the corresponding settings, see: R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995)
18. {M} L, for any given set of measurements U ≥ L holds.