Self-reported effectiveness of double-fine zones as a speed control measure

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 17-28

  Jones, Barnie ^a   Haas, Kevin ^a   Kirk, Alan ^a   Griffith, Andrew ^b  

^a OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^b Res and Technology Transfer Office   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DRIVING ABILITY; INSURANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRAFFIC; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VELOCITY;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; ATTITUDE; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSURANCE, ACCIDENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OREGON; PUNISHMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

EID: 22544481179     PISSN: 11755652     EISSN: 11755652     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00148365-200403010-00005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hunter-Zaworski K, Price N. Evaluation of the corridor safety improvement program, phase 1: final report [report no.: FHWA-OR-RD-98-20]. Salem (OR): Oregon Department of Transportation, 1998
2. Ross HL. Deterring the drinking driver, legal policy and social control. Lexington (MA): Lexington Books, 1982
3. Ullman GL, Carlson PJ, Trout ND. Effect of the work zone double-fine law in Texas. Transp Res Rec 2000; 1715: 24-9
4. Khorashadi A. Safety enhancement, double fine zone: a report to the legislature [report no.: CA-TO-97-01]. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Transportation, 1997
5. Traffic Operations Program. Safety enhancement, double fine zones: report to the legislature. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Transportation, 2002. Report no.: CCSD03-B959
6. Sisiopiku V, Patel H. Study of the impact of police enforcement on motorists speeds. Transp Res Rec 1999; 1693: 31-6
7. Pesti G, McCoy PT. Long-term effectiveness of speed monitoring displays in work zones on rural interstate highways. Transp Res Rec 2000; 1754: 21-30
8. Kamyab A, Maze TH, Gent S, et al. Work zone speed control and management by state transportation agencies and toll authorities. 80th Meeting of the Transpor-tation Research Board; 2001 Jan 7-11; Washington, DC
9. Bloch S. Comparative study of speed reduction effects of photo-radar and speed display boards. Transp Res Rec 1998; 1640: 27-37
10. Ragnoy A. Cameras led to a speed reduction. Nordic Road Transp Res 2002; 3: 16-7
11. Chen G, Wilson J, Meckle P, et al. Evaluation of photo radar program in British Columbia. Accid Anal Prev 2000; 32: 517-26
12. Chen G, Meckle W, Wilson J. Speed and safety effect of photo radar enforcement on a highway corridor in British Columbia. Accid Anal Prev 2002; 34: 129-38
13. Keall MD, Povey LJ, Frith WJ. The relative effectiveness of a hidden versus a visible speed camera programme. Accid Anal Prev 2001; 33: 277-84
14. Keall MD, Povey LJ, Frith WJ. Further results from a trial comparing a hidden speed camera programme with a visible camera operation. Accid Anal Prev 2002; 34: 733-77
15. Cameron M, Newstead E, Diamantopoulou K, et al. The interaction between speed camera enforcement and speed-related mass media publicity in Victoria [report no.: 201]. Clayton (VIC): Monash University Accident Research Centre, 2003
16. Cai Q. 2000 Oregon Population Report. Portland (OR): Population Research Center, College of Urban Affairs, Portland State University, 2000
17. US Census Bureau. Profiles of general demographic characteristics. 2000 Census of population and housing [online]. Available from URL: http://factfinder.cen-sus.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program= DEC&_lang=en [Accessed 2002 Oct 30]
18. US Census Bureau. Census 2000 supplementary survey summary tables: Oregon, QT-02, profile of selected social characteristics [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2002 Oct 30]