Three obstacles to validating the Verbal-Imager Subtest of the Cognitive Styles Analysis

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 845-848

  Massa, Laura J ^a   Mayer, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive style; Cognitive styles analysis; Validity; Verbal; Visual

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544479428     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. F. Coffield D. Moseley E. Hall & K. Ecclestone Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice 2004 Learning and Skills Research Centre London
2. F. Coffield D. Moseley E. Hall & K. Ecclestone Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review 2004 Learning and Skills Research Centre London
3. D.H. Jonassen & B.L. Grabowski Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction 1993 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
4. Massa, L.J., & Mayer, R. E. (in review). Should we design multimedia instruction to accommodate verbalizer - visualizer cognitive style? Journal of Educational Psychology.
5. R.E. Mayer & L.J. Massa Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference Journal of Educational Psychology 95 2003 833-846
6. E.R. Peterson I.J. Deary & E.J. Austin The reliability of Riding's cognitive style analysis test Personality and Individual Differences 34 2003 881-891
7. A. Richardson Verbalizer - visualizer: A cognitive style dimension Journal of Mental Imagery 1 1977 109-126
8. R.J. Riding Cognitive styles analysis 1991 Learning and Training Technology Birmingham, UK
9. R.J. Riding Cognitive styles analysis - research applications 1998 Learning and Training Technology Birmingham, UK
10. R.J. Riding & S.G. Rayner Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour 1998 David Fulton Publishers London