Lumbar nerve root palsy after adult spinal deformity surgery

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 14, 2005, Pages 1632-1636

  Pateder, Dhruv B ^a,b   Kostuik, John P ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

complications; incidence; Nerve root palsy; prognosis; Spinal deformity; Spinal surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINAL PARALYSIS; SPINAL ROOT; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RADICULOPATHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL NERVE ROOTS;

EID: 22544478457     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170292.87470.92     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Winter R. Neurologic safety in spinal deformity surgery. Spine 1997;22: 1527-33.
2. Bridwell K, Lenke L, Baldus C. Major intraoperative neurologic defects in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients: incidence and etiology at one institution. Presented to the Scoliosis Research Society, 1996 Sept 25-28. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Milwaukee, WI: Scoliosis Research Society; 1996.
3. Letts R, Hollenberg C. Delayed patesis following spinal fusion with Harrington instrumentation. Clin Orthop 1977;125:45-8.
4. MacEwen G, Bunnell W, Stiram K. Acute neurologic complications in the treatment of scoliosis: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:404-8.
5. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Nukai Y. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine 2003;28:2447-51.
6. Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Motor affliction of the L5 nerve root in lumbar nerve root compression syndromes. Spine 1995;20:2012-15.
7. Sharrtatd W. Orthopaedic surgery of spina bifida. Clin Orthop 1972;92: 196.
8. Wilburg G, Thompson G, Shaffer J. Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:1178-87.
9. Winter R, Andetson M. Spinal arthrodesis for spinal deformity using posterior instrumentation and sublaminar wiring: a preliminary report of 100 consecutive cases. Int Orthop 1985;9:239-45.
10. Zielke K, Pellen B. The neurological risk of Hatrington procedures. Arch Orthop Unfall Chir 1975;83:311-22.
11. Ginsbutg H, Shetter A, Randzens P. Postopetative pataplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Orthop Trans 1984;8:161.
12. Blumenthal S, Gill K. Complications of the Wilste pedicle screw fixation system. Spine 1993;18:1867-71.
13. Shapiro S, Snyder W. Spinal instrumentation with a low complication rate. Surg Neurol 1997;48:566-74.
14. Slone R, MacMillan M, Montgomery W. Spinal fixation. Part 3. Complications of spinal instrumentation. Radiographics 1993;13:797-816.
15. Dolan E, Transfeldt E, Tater C, et al. The effect of spinal distraction on regional spinal cord blood flow in cats. J Neurosurg 1980;53:756-64.
16. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, et al. Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 1999;24: 1527-31.
17. Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An H, et al. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine 2000;25:286-91.
18. Sato K, Kikuchi S. An anatomic study of foraminal nerve root lesions in the lumbat spine. Spine 1993;18:2246-51.
19. Attar A, Ugur H, Uz A, et al. Lumbat pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relationships. Eur Spine J 2001;10:10-15.
20. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994; 19:507-10.
21. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, et al. Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord II; Analyses of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 1993;2:197-202.