Assessing student performance on EC2000 criterion 3.a-k

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 10151-10167

  Strauss, Linda C ^a   Terenzini, Patrick T ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

PROGRAM ACCREDITATION; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK SKILLS; TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE;

STUDENTS;

EID: 22544478178     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Weiss, M., & Aldridge, M. D. (2002). Assessing the effects of the ABET/NSF/Industry regional faculty workshops. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18 (2): 245-253.
2. Engineering Accreditation Commission. (1997). Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Engineering in the United States (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.
3. Muchinsky, P. M. (2004). When the Psychometrics of test development meets organizational realities: A conceptual framework for organizational change, examples, and recommendations. Personnel Psychology, 57 (1): 175-209.
4. nd ed., pp. 46-80). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
5. th Annual National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance National Conference. March 7-10, Washington, D.C.
6. Colbeck, C. L., Cabrera, A. F., & Marine, R. J. (2001). Assessing overall competence of faculty: EC criterion 7. ASEE Conference Proceedings, 2001. CD Rom. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
7. Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., & Colbeck, C. L. (1999). Assessing classroom activities and outcomes, In Proceedings, 1999, Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 19-24.
8. Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., & Terenzini, P. T. (2001). Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning: The case of engineering. Research in Higher Education, 42 (3), 327-352.
9. Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: R. McNally.
10. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 17. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In H. Costner (Ed.). Sociological Methodology: 1973-1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 17-50.
12. Pike, G.R., "The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores," Research in Higher Education, vol. 36, 1995, pp. 1-22.
13. Anaya, G., "College impact on student learning: comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades," Research in Higher Education, vol. 40, 1999, pp. 499-527.
14. Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., O'Day, P., T., & Kuh, G. D. "Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of greek-letter organizations and other students," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 43(5), 2002, pp. 643-663.
15. Laing, J., Sawyer, R., & Noble, J. "Accuracy of self-reported activities and accomplishments of college-bound seniors" Journal of College Student Development, vol 29(4), 1998, pp. 362-368.
16. Converse, J. M. & Presser, S. (1989) Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Pace, C. R. (1985). The credibility of student self-reports. Los Angeles: University of California, The Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education.
18. Bradburn, N. M. & Sudman, S. (1988). Polls and surveys: Understanding what they tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.