Formal relation among various Hermitian and non-Hermitian effective interactions

International Journal of Modern Physics E

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-28

  Okamoto, Ryoji ^a   Fujii, Shinichiro ^b   Suzuki, Kenji ^a  

^a KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bi orthogonal; Decoupling; Effective interaction; Hermitian; Model space; Non hermitian

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544473909     PISSN: 02183013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218301305002734     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Hjorth-Jensen, T. T. S. Kuo and E. Osnes, Phys. Rep. 261 (1995) 125.
2. K. Suzuki and S. Y. Lee, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980) 2091.
3. K. Suzuki and R. Okamoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983) 439;
4. Prog. Theor. Phys. ibid. 71 (1984) 670.
5. K. Suzuki and R. Okamoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71 (1984) 1221;
6. Prog. Theor. Phys. ibid. 72 (1984) 534.
7. K. Suzuki and R. Okamoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 92 (1994) 1045.
8. D. Holt, T. T. S. Kuo and G. E. Brown, Phys. Rev. C69 (2004) 034329.
9. S. Okubo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 12 (1954) 603.
10. P. Navrátil, H. B. Geyer and T. T. S. Kuo, Phys. Lett. 315 (1993) 1.
11. A. Poves and A. Zuker, Phys. Rep. 71 (1981) 141.
12. C. Bloch and J. Horowitz, Nucl. Phys. 8 (1958) 91.
13. T. Kato, Prog. Theor. Phys. 4 (1949) 514.
14. K. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982) 246.
15. I. Shavitt and L. T. Redmond, J. Chem. Phy. 73 (1980) 5711.
16. P. Westhaus, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 20 (1981) 1243.
17. J. des Cloizeaux, Nucl. Phys. 20 (1960) 321.
18. B. H. Brandow, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39 (1967) 771.
19. B. H. Brandow, in Effective Interactions and Operators in Nuclei, ed. B. R. Barrett, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 40 (Springer, Berlin, 1975), p. 1.
20. J. H. van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 33 (1929) 467.
21. B. H. Brandow, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 15 (1979) 207.
22. F. Andreozzi, Phys. Rev. C54 (1996) 684.