Diversity in engineering education-What are the perceived issues?

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 4693-4697

  Purdy, Carla ^a   Wasburn, Mara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS;

ENGINEERING GRADUATE PROGRAMS; ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTS; ENGINEERING PROFESSION;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 22544449893     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. S. Greenwood-Gowen and A. Waller, An Introduction to Educational Research, ASEE National Meeting Workshop, Montreal, Canada, June 16, 2002.
2. National Science Foundation ADVANCE Program, RFP, 2002, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02121/nsf02121.htm#TOC
3. Report of the Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development, September 2000, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02121/nsf02121.htm#TOC, p. 6.
4. M. MacDonnell-Laeser, B.M. Moskal, R. Knecht, and D. Lasich, The engineering process: examining male and female contributions. Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV, October 2001, p. 1.
5. WEPAN data sets, http://www.wepan.org.
6. American Council on Education, http://www.acenet.edu/hena/readArticle. cfm?articleID=503.
7. N. Horvath and C. Lucero, Graduate student socialization in science and engineering: a study of underrepresented minorities' experiences. Proceedings 2004 ASEE Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2004.
8. S. S. Swinton, The predictive validity of the restructured GRE with particular attention to older students. GRE Report 83-25P, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1987.
9. J. M. Souza, Biased GRE test limits women applicants. Women in Higher Education, Vol 13, #2, p. 46, 2004.
10. J.Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the Clubhouse, Women in Computing, MIT Press, 2002.
11. M. H. Wasbum, Rebuilding community. College &University, 78, (1), 13-16, 2002.
12. S.V. Rosser, Reaching the majority: Retaining women in the pipeline. In S.V. Rosser (Ed.), Teaching the Majority, (pp. 1-21). New York: Teachers College Press, 1995.
13. C.M. Golde and T.M. Dore, At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal About Doctoral Education. Pew Charitable Trusts, http://www.phd-survey.org/report.htm/, 2001.
14. N.M. Bohonak, Attracting and retaining women in graduate programs in computer science. In S.V. Rosser (Ed.), Teaching the Majority (pp. 169-180).New York: Teachers College Press, 1995.
15. Faculty for the Future web site, http://Facultyforthe Future.org.
16. C.S. Hollenshead, S.A. Wenzel, B.B. Lazarus, and I. Nair, The graduate experience in the sciences and engineering: Rethinking a gendered institution. In C.S. Davis et al. (Eds.), The Equity Equation (pp. 122-162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
17. B.B. Lazarus, L.M. Ritter, and S.A. Ambrose, The Woman's Guide to Navigating the Ph.D. in Engineering & Science. New York: IEEE Press, 2001.
18. J.M. Mencucci, Mentoring of women science and engineering doctoral students. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1996.
19. Preparing Future Faculty web site, http://www.pareparing-faculty.org.
20. M. Wasburn, Creating community: A pilot program for doctoral students. Proc. ASEE 2002 Conference.