Mixed Monte Carlo/bootstrap approach to assessing king and Spanish mackerel in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico: Its evolution and impact

American Fisheries Society Symposium

Volumn 2002, Issue 27, 2002, Pages 37-44

  Legault, Christopher M ^a   Powers, Joseph E ^a   Restrepo, Victor R ^b  

^a NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCOMBEROMORUS;

EID: 22544449199     PISSN: 08922284     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.
2. Gavaris, S. 1988. An adaptive framework for the estimation of population size. CAFSAC (Canadian Atlantic Fisheries Scientific Advisory Committee) Research Document 88/29, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia.
3. Legault, C. M. 1998. Linking total catch quotas and allocation schemes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:454-457.
4. Legault, C. M., N. Cummings, and P. Phares. 1998. Stock assessment analyses on Atlantic migratory group king mackerel, Gulf of Mexico migratory group king mackerel, Atlantic migratory group Spanish mackerel, and Gulf of Mexico migratory group Spanish mackerel. NMFS-SEFSC Sustainable Fisheries Division Contribution MIA-97/98-15. Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel Contribution MSAP/98/09.
5. Legault, C. M. 1999a. Updated Projections for King and Spanish Mackerel in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean. Sustainable Fisheries Division Contribution SFD-98/99-49. Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel Contribution MSAP/99/01.
6. Legault, C. M. 1999b. Status review of king mackerel in the Gulf of Mexico (Feature Article 3). Pages 81-86 in Our Living Oceans. Report on the status of U.S. living marine resources. NOAA Tech. Mem. NMFS-F/ SPO-41.
7. Legault, C. M. 1999c. Simulation Study of Percentile and Bias Corrected Percentile Confidence Intervals for Allowable Biological Catch. Sustainable Fisheries Division Contribution SFD-98/99-48. Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel Contribution MSAP/99/02.
8. MRFSS (Marine Recreational Fishery Statistics Survey). 1991. Marine Recreational Fishery Statistics Survey, Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, 1987-89. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. Current Fisheries Statistics Number 8904.
9. MSAP (Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel). 1999. 1999 Report of the Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel. March 29-April 4, 1999. Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils.
10. McAllister, M. K., and J. N. Ianelli. 1997. Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling-importance resampling algorithm. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 54:284-300.
11. Nichols, S. 1985. Assessment of king mackerel via virtual population analysis. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, ML1-85-19, Miami, Florida.
12. Parrack, M. L. 1986. A method for analyzing catches and abundance indices from a fishery. Int. Comm. Cons. Atl. Tunas (ICCAT) Coll. Volume Sci. Pap. 24:209-221.
13. Poole, D., G. H. Givens, and A. E. Raftery. 1999. On a proposed stock assessment method and its application at the International Whaling Commission. Fish. Bull. U.S. 97: 144-152.
14. Powers, J. E., editor. 1985. Report of the Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel Meeting, August 14-15, 1985. Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, ML1-85-23, Miami, Florida.
15. Powers, J. E. 1986. Discussion notes on king mackerel ABC risks. Report to Gulf and South Atlantic Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, Florida.
16. Powers, J. E., editor. 1989. Report of the Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel Meeting, April 4-7, 1989. Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fishery Management Councils. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, CRD-89/90-12, Miami, Florida.
17. Powers, J. E. 1995. Benchmark requirements for recovering fish stocks. N. American J. Fish. Man. 16:495-504.
18. Powers, J. E., and P. Eldridge. 1983. A preliminary assessment of icing mackerel resources of the Southeast United States. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center. SAW/84/GCP/1.
19. Powers, J. E., and P. Eldridge. 1984. Assessment of Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic king mackerel. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center. SAW/84/GCP/2.
20. Powers, J. E., and V. R. Restrepo. 1993. Evaluation of stock assessment research for Gulf of Mexico king mackerel: benefits and costs to management. N. American J. Fish. Man. 13:15-26.
21. Punt, A., and D. B. Butterworth. 1997. Assessments of the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort Seas stock of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticus) using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. 47:603-618.
22. Punt, A., and R. Hilborn. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7:35-63.
23. Raiffa, H. 1970. Decision analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
24. Restrepo, V. R. 1996. Fadapt Version 3.0: a users guide. University of Miami, Florida.
25. Restrepo, V. R., J. E. Powers, and S. C. Turner. 1991. Incorporating uncertainty in VPA results via simulation. Int. Com. Cons. Atl. Tunas Coll. Volume Sci. Pap. 39:540-553.
26. Restrepo, V. R., G. G. Thompson, P. M. Mace, W. L. Gabriel, L. L. Low, A. D. MacCall, R. D. Methot, J. E. Powers, B. L. Taylor, P. R. Wade, and J. F. Witzig. 1998. Technical Guidance on the use of Precautionary Approaches to implementing National Standard 1 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. NOAA Tech. Mem. NMFS-F/SPO-31.
27. Restrepo, V. R., J. M. Hoenig, J. E. Powers, J. W. Baird, and S. C. Turner. 1992. A simple simulation approach to risk and cost analysis, with applications to swordfish and cod fisheries. Fish. Bull. U.S. 90:736-748.
28. Wade, P. R. In Press. A comparison of statistical methods for fitting population models to data. Pages 249-270 in L. Mcdonald et al., editors. Marine mammal survey and assessment methods. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.