Developing a peer evaluation instrument that is simple, reliable, and valid

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 4075-4079

  Ohland, Matthew W ^a,b   Loughry, Misty L ^a   Carter, Rufus L ^c   Bullard, Lisa G ^e   Felder, Richard M ^d   Finelli, Cynthia J ^f   Layton, Richard A ^f   Schmucker, Douglas G ^f  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IFIP Working Group 73   (United States)

^c MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d North Carolina State University   (United States)

^e Undergraduate Studies in Chemical Engineering

^f Undergraduate Studies in Chemical Engineering ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING; CURRICULA; DATA ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; STUDENTS;

BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES (BARS); CLEMSON PROTOCOL; ROSE-HULMAN TIME SERIES; WESTERN KENTUCKY VERBAL PROTOCOL ANALYSIS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 22544443662     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ohland, M.W., M.L. Loughry, R.L. Carter, and A.G. Yuhasz, "Designing a Peer Evaluation Instrument that is Simple, Reliable, and Valid" Proc. Amer. Soc. Eng. Ed., Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2004.
2. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Published by The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Baltimore, Maryland. Last accessed on January 5, 2005; http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/E00105-06 EAC Criteria11-17-04.pdf (criteria approved November 17, 2004).
3. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co., (1998).
4. Brown, R.W., "Autorating: Getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork," Proc. Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE/ASEE, Pittsburgh, November (1995).
5. Kaufman, D.B., R.M. Felder, and H. Fuller, "Accounting for Individual Effort in Cooperative Learning Teams," J. Engr. Education, 89(2), 133-140 (2000).
6. Smith, P.C. & Kendall, L.M., Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 447: 149-155 (1963).
7. Landy, F.J. & Fair, J.L. "Performance rating," Psychological Bulletin, 87: 72-107 (1980).
8. Woehr, D.J., and MJ. Miller, "Distributional ratings of performance: more evidence for a new rating format," Journal of Management, Sept-Oct (1997).
9. Hedge, J. W., Bruskiewicz, K. T., Logan, K. K., Hanson, M. A., and Buck, D. Crew resource management team and individual job analysis and rating scale development for air force tanker crews (Technical Report No. 336). Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Inc. (1999).
10. McGourty, J. and K. De Meuse, The Team Developer: An assessment and skill building program, J. Wiley and Company, New York (2000).
11. McGourty, J., C. Sebastian, and W. Swart, "Development of a comprehensive assessment program in engineering education." J. Engineering Education 87(4), 355-361 (1998).
12. McGourty, J., "Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach," IEEE Trans. Ed., 43(2), 120-124, (2000).
13. Chapman, O. L. and M. A. Fiore. "Calibrated Peer Review™," Journal of Interactive Instruction Development. Winter, pp. 11-15 (2000).
14. Van Duzer, E. and F. McMartin, "Methods to improve the validity and sensitivity of a self/peer assessment instrument," IEEE Trans. Ed., 43(2), 153-158, May (2000).