Evaluation of soil fumigants applied by drip irrigation for liatris production

Plant Disease

Volumn 89, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 883-887

  Gerik, J S ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROMINE COMPOUNDS; IRRIGATION; PLANTS (BOTANY); SODIUM COMPOUNDS; SOILS; WEED CONTROL;

CHEMICAL FORMULATIONS; FUMIGANTS; METHYL BROMIDE (MB);

FUMIGATION;

BROMINE COMPOUNDS; FUMIGATION; IRRIGATION; PLANTS; SODIUM COMPOUNDS; SOIL; STEMS; WEED CONTROL;

FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM; LIATRIS; PYTHIUM; PYTHIUM ULTIMUM; SCLEROTINIA SCLEROTIORUM;

EID: 22544440885     PISSN: 01912917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/PD-89-0883     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams, P. B., Krikum, J., Johnston, S. A., and Carpenter, H. H. 1981. Use of metham applied through sprinkler irrigation to control lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia minor. (Abstr.). Phytopathology 71:764.
2. Ajwa, H. A., and Trout, T. 2004. Drip application of alternative fumigants to methyl bromide for strawberry production. HortScience 39:1707-1715.
3. Ajwa, H. A., Trout, T., Mueller, J., Wilhelm, S., Nelson, S. D., Soppe, K., and Shatley, D. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology 92:1349-1355.
4. Allan, M. A. 2002. Midas (TM-425), 2002 development and regulatory update. Page 76 in: Proc. Annu. Int. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Emissions Reductions. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Outreach. Fresno, CA.
5. Anonymous. 1998. Assessment of Alternatives to Methyl Bromide. Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee, United Nations Environmental Programme Ozone Secretariat, Nairobi, Kenya.
6. Anonymous. 2000. Economic implications of the methyl bromide phaseout. Econ. Res. Serv. U. S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Inf. Bull. No. 756 (AIB-756).
7. Anonymous. 2003. Floriculture Crops 2002 Summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
8. Anonymous. 2005. United States nomination for critical use exemptions from the 2006 phaseout of methyl bromide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Online. http://www. epa.gov/ozone/mbr/2006_nomination.html.
9. Chandler, C. K., Legard, D. E., and Noling, J. W. 2001. Performance of strawberry cultivars on fumigated and nonfumigated soil in Florida. HortTechnology 11:69-71.
10. Csinos, A. S., Johnson, W. C., Johnson, A. W., Sumner, D. R., McPherson, R. M., and Gitaitis, R. D. 1997. Alternative fumigants for methyl bromide in tobacco and pepper transplant production. Crop Prot. 16:585-594.
11. Csinos, A. S., Sumner, D. R., Johnson, W. C., Johnson, A. W., McPherson, R. M., and Dowler, C. C. 2000. Methyl bromide alternatives in tobacco, tomato and pepper transplant production. Crop Prot. 19:39-49.
12. de Cal, A., Martinez-Treceno, A., Lopez-Aranda, J. M., and Melgarejo, P. 2004. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide in Spanish strawberry nurseries. Plant Dis. 88:210-214.
13. Elmore, C. L., MacDonald, J., Bolkan, L., Roncoroni, J., Zasada, I., and Tjosvold, S. 2001. Evaluations of pest control over two years in field pots. Page 104 in: Proc. Annu. Int. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Emissions Reductions. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Outreach, Fresno, CA.
14. Elmore, C. L., Roncoroni, J., MacDonald, J., Bolkan, L., Zasada, I., Ferris, H., and Tjosvold, S. 2000. Solarization and biofumigation for field-grown flowers. Page 96 in: Proc. Annu. Int. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Emissions Reductions. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Outreach, Fresno, CA.
15. Fennimore, S. A., Haar, M. J., and Ajwa, H. A. 2003. Weed control in strawberry provided by shank- and drip-applied methyl bromide alternative fumigants. HortScience 38:55-61.
16. Gerik, J. S., Vail, S. S., Elmore, C. L., and Greene, I. D. 2003. Alternatives to methyl bromide for calla lily production. (Abstr.). Phytopathology 93:S29.
17. Gilreath, J. P., Jones, J. P., Santos, B. M., and Overman, A. J. 2004. Soil fumigant evaluations for soilborne pest and Cyperus rotundus control in fresh market tomato. Crop Prot. 23:889-893.
18. Gilreath, J. P., Noling, J. W., and Santos, B. M. 2004. Methyl bromide alternatives for bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) rotations. Crop Prot. 23:347-351.
19. Gilreath, J. P., and Santos, B. M. 2004. Methyl bromide alternatives for weed and soilborne disease management in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Crop Prot. 23:1193-1198.
20. Gilreath, J. P., Santos, B. M., Gilreath, P. R., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 2004. Efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene plus chloropicrin application methods in combination with pebulate and napropamide in tomato. Crop Prot. 23:1187-1191.
21. Hutchinson, C. M., McGiffen, M. E. J., Ohr, H. D., Sims, J. J., and Becker, J. O. 2000. Efficacy of methyl iodide synergy with chloropicrin for control of soil fungi. Pest Manage. Sci. 56:413-418.
22. Komada, H. 1975. Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil. Rev. Plant Prot. Res. 8:114-125.
23. Locascio, S. J., Gilreath, J. P., Dickson, D. W., Kucharek, T. A., Jones, J. P., and Noling, J. W. 1997. Fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide for polyethylene-mulched tomato. HortScience 32:1208-1211.
24. Rohde, W. A., Johnson, A. W., White, L. V., McAllister, D. L., and Glaze, N. C. 1980. Dispersion, dissipation, and efficacy of methyl bromide-chloropicrin gas vs. gel formulations on nematodes and weeds in Tifton sandy loam. J. Nematol. 12:39-44.
25. Stanghellini, M. E., and Hancock, J. G. 1970. A quantitative method for the isolation of Pythium ultimum from soil. Phytopathology 60:551-552.