A nonlinear model of word length effects in apraxia of speech

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 603-623

  Ziegler, Wolfram ^a,b  

^a KLINIKUM BOGENHAUSEN   (Germany)

^b Entwicklungsgruppe Klin N   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; APRAXIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METRIC SYSTEM; NONLINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH DISORDER; STATISTICAL MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VARIANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 22544436967     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000211     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004a). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 88, 148-159.
2. Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004b). Segmental and metrical encoding in aphasia: Two case reports. Aphasiology, 18, 1201-1211.
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Bachoud-Lévi, A. C., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L., Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect - a cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 331-346.
5. Ballard, K. J., Granier, J. P., & Robin, D. A. (2000). Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: Theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology, 14, 969-995.
6. Best, W. (1995). A reverse length effect in dysphasic naming: When elephant is easier than ant. Cortex, 31, 637-652.
7. Brendel, B., Ziegler, W., & Deger, K. (2000). The synchronization paradigm in the treatment of apraxia of speech. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 254-257.
8. Caplan, D. (1987). Phonological representations in word production. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language (pp. 111-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
9. Clements, G. N., & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology. A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Croot, K. (2002). Diagnosis of AOS: Definition and criteria. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 267-280.
11. Croot, K., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1998). Single word production in nonfluent progressive aphasia. Brain and Language, 61, 226-273.
12. De Jong, K. J. (2001). Effects of syllable affiliation and consonant voicing on temporal adjustment in a repetitive speech-production task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 826-840.
13. Deal, J. L., & Darley, F. L. (1972). The influence of linguistic and situational variables on phonemic accuracy in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 639-653.
14. Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley.
15. Dronkers, N. F. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384, 159-161.
16. Ellis, A. W., Miller, D., & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke's aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognition, 15, 111-144.
17. Féry, C. (1998). German word stress in optimality theory. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics, 2, 101-142.
18. Glosser, G., Kohn, S. E., Friedman, R. B., Sands, L., & Grugan, P. (1997). Repetition of single words and nonwords in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 33, 653-666.
19. Goldsmith, J. A. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Haley, K. L., & Overton, H. B. (2001). Word length and vowel duration in apraxia of speech: The use of relative measures. Brain and Language, 79, 397-406.
21. Hillis, A. E., Work, M., Barker, P. B., Jacobs, M. A., Breese, E. L., & Maurer, K. (2004). Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain, 127, 1479-1487.
22. Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (1988). Missing the meaning? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener Apasie Test (AAT). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
24. Jaeger, M., & Ziegler, W. (1993). Der metrische Übungsansatz in der Sprechapraxiebehandlung: Ein Fallbericht. Neurolinguistik, 7, 31-41.
25. Johns, D. F., & Darley, F. L. (1970). Phonemic variability in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 556-583.
26. Katz, R. B., & Goodglass, H. (1990). Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder. Brain and Language, 39, 153-185.
27. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 295-311.
28. Kohn, S. E. (1989). The nature of the phonemic string deficit in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 209-239.
29. Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1990). Between-word speech errors in conduction aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 133-156.
30. Krakow, R. A. (1999). Physiological organization of syllables: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 33-54.
31. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
32. Liepold, M., Ziegler, W., & Brendel, B. (2003). Hierarchische Wortlisten. Ein Nachsprechtest für die Sprechapraxiediagnostik. Dortmund, Germany: Borgmann.
33. McCarthy, R., & Warrington, E. K. (1984). A two-route model of speech production. Brain, 107, 463-485.
34. McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 311-344). New York: Thieme.
35. Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 131-147.
36. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33, 1281-1303.
37. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2000). When the words won't come: Relating impairments and models of spoken word production. In L. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 115-142). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
38. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 57-78.
39. Odell, K., McNeil, M., Rosenbek, J. C., & Hunter, L. (1990). Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by apraxic speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 345-359.
40. Pate, D. S., Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1987). Specifying the nature of the production impairment in a conduction aphasic: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 43-84.
41. Roelofs, A. (2002). Syllable structure effects turn out to be word length effects: Comments on Santiago et al. (2000). Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 1-13.
42. Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1998). Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 922-939.
43. Romani, C., & Calabrese, A. (1998). Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 64, 83-121.
44. Rosenbek, J. C., Kent, R. D., & Lapointe, L. L. (1984). Apraxia of speech: An overview and some perspectives. In J. C. Rosenbek, M. R. McNeil, & A. E. Aronson (Eds.), Apraxia of speech: Physiology, acoustics, linguistics, management (pp. 1-72). San Diego: College Hill Press.
45. Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., & Palma, A. (2002). Length effects turn out to be syllable structure effects: Response to Roelofs (2002). Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 15-29.
46. Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., Palma, A., & Rho, C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 1-44.
47. Schiff, H. B., Alexander, M. P, Naeser, M., & Galaburda, A. M. (1983). Aphemia. Clinical-anatomic correlations. Archives of Neurology, 40, 720-727.
48. Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I., & Zadini, A. (2000). The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 517-546.
49. SPSS (2001). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (v. 11.0 for Windows). New York: Prentice Hall International.
50. Taubner, R. W., Raymer, A. M., & Heilman, K. M. (1999). Frontal-opercular aphasia. Brain and Language, 70, 240-261.
51. Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech? Aphasiology, 15, 39-49.
52. Varley, R., Whiteside, S., & Luff, H. (1999). Apraxia of speech as a disruption of word-level schemata: Some durational evidence. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 127-132.
53. Wertz, R. T., Lapointe, L. L., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1984). Apraxia of speech in adults. The disorder and its management. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
54. Wiese, R. (2000). The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Ziegler, W. (2002). Psycholinguistic and motor theories of apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 231-243.
56. Ziegler, W., & Jaeger, M. (1993). Aufgabenhierarchien in der Sprechapraxie-Therapie und der "metrische" Übungsansatz. Neurolinguistik, 7, 17-29.
57. Ziegler, W., & Maassen, B. (2004). The role of the syllable in disorders of spoken language production. In B. Maassen, R. D. Kent, H. F. M. Peters, P. H. H. M. van Lieshout, & W. Hulstijn (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 415-447). Oxford: Oxford University Press.