Plant architecture and leaf damage in bear oak II: Insect usage patterns

Northeastern Naturalist

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-168

  Wilkens, Richard T ^a   Vanderklein, Dirk W ^b   Lemke II, Richard W ^c  

^a DOWLING COLLEGE   (United States)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Sachem High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYNIPIDAE; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; QUERCUS ILICIFOLIA;

EID: 22544435532     PISSN: 10926194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1092-6194(2005)012[0153:PAALDI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrahamson, W.G., M.D. Hunter, G. Melika, and P.W. Price. 2003. Cynipid gall-wasp communities correlate with oak chemistry. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:209-223.
2. Aizen, M.A., and W.A. Patternson. 1995. Leaf phenology and herbivory along a temperature gradient: A spatial test of the phenological window hypothesis. Journal of Vegetation Science 6:543-550.
3. Bergvinson, D.J., J.T. Arnason, R.I. Hamilton, J.A. Mihm, and D.C. Jewell. 1994. Determining leaf toughness and its role in maize resistance to the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 87:1743-1748.
4. Bradley, K.L., E.I. Damschen, L.M. Young, D. Kue-Fler, S. Went, G. Wray, N.M. Haddad, J.M.H. Knops, and S.M. Louda. 2003. Spatial heterogeneity, not visitation bias, dominates variation in herbivory. Ecology 84:2214-2221.
5. Casey, T.M. 1993. Effects of temperature on foraging of caterpillars. Pp. 5-28, In N.E. Stamp and T.M. Casey (Eds.). Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
6. Casher, L.E. 1996. Leaf toughness in Quercus agrifolia and its effects on tissue selection by first instars of Phryganidia californica (Lepidoptera: Dioptidae) and Bucculatrix albertiella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89:109-121.
7. Coffelt, M.A., and P.B. Schultz. 1994. Within-tree distribution and a fixed-precision-level sampling plan for the orangestriped oakworm (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 87:382-388.
8. Craig T.P., J.K. Itami, and P.W. Price. 1989. A strong relationship between oviposition preference and larval performance in a shoot-galling sawfly. Ecology 70:1691-1699.
9. Fitter, A.H., and R.K.H. Hay. 1987. Environmental Physiology of Plants. Alden Press, Oxford, UK.
10. Hamback, P.A., J. Agren, and L. Ericson. 2000. Associational resistance: Insect damage to purple loosestrife reduced in thickets of sweet gale. Ecology 81:1784-1794.
11. nd Edition. Prentice Hall, NJ.
12. Kessler, A., and I.T. Baldwin. 2002. Manduca quinquemaculata's optimization of intra-plant oviposition to predation, food quality, and thermal constraints. Ecology 83:2346-2354.
13. Murakami, M., and N. Wada. 1997. Difference in leaf quality between canopy trees and seedlings affects migration and survival of spring-feeding moth larvae. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:1351-1356.
14. Neuvonen, S. 1999. Random foraging by herbivores: Complex patterns may be due to plant architecture. Journal of Ecology 87:526-528.
15. Prado, P.I.K.L., and E. Monteiro Viera. 1999. The interplay between plant traits and herbivore attack: A study of stem galling midge in the neotropics. Ecological Entomology 24:80-88.
16. Price, P.W. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244-251.
17. Price, P.W., and K.M. Clancy. 1986. Interactions among 3 trophic levels: Gall size and parasitoid attack. Ecology 67:1593-1600.
18. Reavey, D. 1993. Why body size matters to caterpillars. Pp. 248-280, In N.E. Stamp and T.M. Casey (Eds.). Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
19. Reed, J.L., and B.C. McCarthy. 1996. Patterns of leaf tannin variation in chestnut oak (Quercus prinus) and black oak (Quercus velutina) with respect to topography in a southeastern Ohio oak-hickory forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123:243-248.
20. Reich, P.B., D.S. Ellsworth, M.B. Walters, J.M. Vose, C. Gresham, J.C. Volin, and W.D. Bowman. 1999. Generality of leaf trait relationships: A test across six biomes. Ecology 80:1955-1969.
21. Reich, P.B., M.B. Walter, and D.S. Ellsworth. 1997. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 94:13730-13734.
22. Rohfritsch, O. 1992. Patterns in gall development. Pp. 60-86, In J.D. Shorthouse and O. Rohfritsch (Eds.). Biology of Insect-Induced Galls. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
23. Slansky, F.J. 1993. Nutritional ecology: The fundamental quest for nutrients. Pp. 29-91, In N.E. Stamp and T.M. Casey (Eds.). Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
24. Vanderklein, D.W., R.T. Wilkens, A. Cartier, and R.W. Lemke, II. 2004. Plant architecture and leaf damage in bear oak, I: Physiological responses. Northeastern Naturalist 11(3):343-356.
25. Weiss, A.E., and Abrahamson W.G. 1985. Potential selective pressures by parasitoids on a plant-herbivore interaction. Ecology 66:1261-1269.
26. Weiss, A.E., W.G. Abrahamson, and K.D. McCrea. 1985. Host gall size and oviposition success by the parasitoid Eurytoma gigantea. Ecological Entomology 10:341-348.
27. Weiss, A.E., R. Walton, and C.L. Crego. 1988. Reactive plant tissue sites and the population biology of gall makers. Annual Review of Entomology 33:467-486.
28. Wilkens, R.T. 1997. Limitations of evaluating the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis with only two levels of light and water. Écoscience 4:319-326.
29. Wilkens, R.T., J.M. Spoerke, and N.E. Stamp. 1996. Differential responses of growth and soluble phenolics to resource availability. Ecology 71:247-258.
30. Zangerl, A.R., and M.R. Berenbaum. 1993. Plant chemistry, insect adaptations to plant chemistry, and host plant utilization patterns. Ecology 74:47-54.