Options for change: A flexible vehicle for curriculum evolution and reform

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 89-98

  Baldwin, Roger G ^a   Baumann, Melissa J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum; Development; Experimentation; Laboratory; Reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544434375     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-005-4958-7     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Association of American Colleges, Project on liberal learning, study-in-depth, and the arts and sciences major (1991). The challenge of connecting learning. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
2. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12-25.
3. Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Cohen, A. M. (1998). The shaping of American higher education: Emergence and growth of the contemporary system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Gaff, J. G., & Ratcliff, J. L. (1996). Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Guskin, A. E. (1997). Restructuring to enhance student learning (and reduce costs). Liberal Education, 83(2), 10-19.
7. Levine, A. (1978). Handbook on undergraduate curriculum. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Levine, A. (1989). Undergraduate curriculum 2000. In C. H. Pazandak (Vol. Ed.), Improving undergraduate education in large universities (pp. 77-84). New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Levine, A. (1990). Curriculi-Curricula. Change, 22(2), 46-51.
10. Levine, A. (2001). The remaking of the American university. Innovative Higher Education, 25, 253-267.
11. Marcy, M., & Guskin, A. (2003). Project on the future of higher education: Teaching and learning in a climate of restricted resources. Liberal Education, 89(2), 22-29.
12. Registrar's Office. (2002). Academic program terminology. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
13. Stark, J. S., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in action. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
14. Wingspread Group on Higher Education. (1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation and others.
15. Wulf, W A., & Fisher, G. M. C. (2002). A makeover for engineering education. Issues in Science and Technology, 18(3), 35-39.
16. Zemsky, R., & Massy, W F. (1995). Toward an understanding of our current predicaments: Expanding perimeters, melting cores, and sticky functions. Change, 27(6), 40-49.