Community challenge: Enhancing the academic achievement of children and youth

Roeper Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 111-114

  Barnett, Linda Boliek ^a   Gustin, William C ^b   DuSel, James C ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544432180     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199609553802     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Alamprese, J., Erlanger, W., & Brigham, N. (1988). No gift wasted: Effective strategies for educating highly able disadvantaged students in math and science. (Vols. I-II). (USOE contract No. 300-87-0152).
2. Anick, C., Carpenter, T., & Smith, C. (1981). Minorities and mathematics: Results from the national assessment of educational progress. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 560-568.
3. Bhattacharya, D. (1982). Gifted children in mathematicsxase studies. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 2914.
4. Birely, M., & Genshaft, J. (1991). Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues. Education and Psychology of the Gifted Series. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Colangelo, N. (1985). Counseling needs of culturally diverse gifted students. Roeper Review, 8(1), 33-35.
6. Cramer, R. (1989). Attitudes of gifted boys and girls toward mathematics: A qualitative study. Roeper Review, 11, 128-131.
7. Exum, H. (1979). Facilitating psychological and emotional development of gifted black students. In Colangelo, N., & Zaffran, R. (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
8. Exum, H., & Colangelo, N. (1981). Culturally diverse gifted: The need for ethnic identity development. Roeper Review, 3, 15-17.
9. Hale-Benson, J. (1986). Black children: Their roots, culture, and learning styles. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Kolitch, E.R., & Brody, L. (1992). Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 78-86.
11. Lindstrom, R., & Van Sant, S. (1986). Special issues in working with gifted minority adolescents. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 583-586.
12. Robinson, H.B., & Robinson, N.S. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromises for the highly gifted student. In D. Feldman (Ed.), New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (pp. 79-94), No. 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Serwatka, T.S., Deering, S., & Stoddard, A. (1989). Correlates of the underrepresentation of black students in classes for gifted students. Journal of Negro Education, 58(4), 520-530.
14. Stanley, J.C. (1976). Youths who reason extremely well mathematically: SMPY's accelerative approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 237-238.
15. Stanley, J.C. (1977). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh-and eighthgraders. College Board Review, 106, 30-37.
16. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Patton, J., & Prillaman, D. (1989). Disadvantaged gifted learners: At risk for educational attention. Focus on Exceptional Children, 22(3), 1-15.
17. White, K. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481.
18. Yong, F. (1992). Mathematics and science attitudes of African-American middle grade students identified as gifted: Gender and grade differences. Roeper Review, 14(3), 136-140.