BEAM SIZE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL SEM: A COMPARISON OF MODEL AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA

Microscopy and Microanalysis

Volumn 4, Issue , 1998, Pages 298-299

  Wight, S A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22444453888     PISSN: 14319276     EISSN: 14358115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927600021619     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Certain commercial software, equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this report to specify adequately the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
2. D. C. Joy, Microscopy and Microanalysis, (1996)836.
3. C. Bache et al., Microscopy and Microanalysis, Supp 2, 3(1997)1211.
4. G.D. Danilatos, Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, 71(1988)109.
5. R.B. Bolon, Microbeam Analysis, (1991)199.
6. B.J. Griffin, Proc. 50thAnn Mtg o/EMSA, (1992)1324.
7. E. Doehne and N.W. Bower, Microbeam Analysis, 2(1993)S35.
8. B.J. Griffin et al., Microbeam Analysis, 2(1993)S37.
9. B.J. Griffin et al., Microbeam Analysis, (1994)245.
10. C. Gilpin and D.C. Sigee, Journal of Microscopy, Pt. 1, 179(1995)22.
11. B.J. Griffin et al., Microbeam Analysis, (1995)383.
12. B.J. Griffin and C.E. Nockolds, Microscopy and Microanalysis, (1996)842.
13. S.A. Wight et al., Microscopy and Microanalysis, Supp 2, 3(1997)1209.