Donkey business

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 129-156

  Geurts, Bart ^a,b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2242477611     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014624331450     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barker, C.: 1999, 'Individuation and Quantification', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 683-691.
2. Chierchia, G.: 1992, 'Anaphora and Dynamic Binding', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 111-183.
3. Chierchia, G.: 1995, Dynamics of Meaning, University of Chicago Press.
4. Clark, H. H.: 1974, 'Semantics and Comprehension', in T. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, 12. Mouton, The Hague, pp. 1291-1428.
5. Conway, L. and S. Grain: 1995, 'Donkey Anaphora in Child Grammar', in J. N. Beckman (ed.), NELS 25, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
6. Cooper, R.: 1979, 'The Interpretation of Pronouns', in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.), Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, Academic Press, New York, pp. 61-92.
7. Ericsson, K. A. and H. A. Simon: 1984, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
8. Fine, K.: 1982, 'Acts, Events and Things', in W. Eeinfellner, E. Kraemer, and J. Schank (eds.), Language and Ontology: Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Vienna, pp. 97-105.
9. Geach, P. T.: 1962, Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
10. Geurts, B.: 1999, Presuppositions and Pronouns, Elsevier, Oxford.
11. Gupta, A. K.: 1980, The Logic of Common Nouns, Yale University Press, New Haven.
12. Heim, L: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
13. Heim, L: 1990, 'E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137-178.
14. Horn, E. R.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, Chicago University Press.
15. Just, M. A. and P. A. Carpenter: 1971, 'Comprehension of Negation with Quantification', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10, 244-253.
16. Just, M. A.: 1974, 'Comprehending Quantified Sentences: The Relation between Sentencepicture and Semantic Memory Verification', Cognitive Psychology 6, 216-236.
17. Kadmon, N.: 1990, 'Uniqueness', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 273-324.
18. Kamp, H.: 1981, 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation', in J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. B. J. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Amsterdam, pp. 277-322.
19. Kamp, H.: 1991, 'Uniqueness Presuppositions and Plural Anaphora in DTT and DRT', in M. Stokhof, J. Groenendijk, and D. Beaver (eds.), Quantification and Anaphora, Part 1, DYANA deliverable R2.2A, IEEC, University of Amsterdam.
20. Kanazawa, M.: 1994, 'Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonicity Inference in a Dynamic Setting', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 109-158.
21. Krifka, M.: 1990, 'Four Thousand Ships Passed Through the Eock: Object-induced Measure Functions on Events', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 487-520.
22. Krifka, M.: 1996, 'Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predications and Donkey Sentences', in T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VI, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 136-153.
23. Eappin, S.: 2000, 'An Intensional Parametric Semantics for Vague Quantifiers', Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 599-620.
24. Meyer, D. E.: 1970, 'On the Representation and Retrieval of Stored Semantic Information', Cognitive Psychology 1, 242-300.
25. Parsons, T.: 1978, 'Pronouns as Paraphrases', Ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
26. Rooth, M.: 1987, 'Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics', in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 237-268.
27. Strawson, P.: 1950, 'On referring', Mind 59, 320-344.
28. Van der Does, J.: 1993, 'The Dynamics of Sophisticated Eaziness', in J. Groenendijk (ed.), DYANA Deliverable R22A, IEEC, University of Amsterdam. [Reference as given by Chierchia (1995).]
29. Wason, P. C.: 1961, 'Response to Affirmative and Negative Binary Statements', British Journal of Psychology 52, 133-142.
30. Yoon, Y.-E.: 1994, Weak and Strong Interpretations of Quantifiers and Definite NPs in English and Korean, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
31. Yoon, Y.-E.: 1996, 'Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations', Natural Language Semantics 4, 217-236.