Synthesis and characterization of 9,10-bis(arylimino)-9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes, the structure of (Z,Z)-9,10-bis(phenylimino)-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene and PdCl2-[(E,E)-9,10-bis(phenylimino)-9,10-dihydrophenanthrene] in the solid state and in solution

Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas-Journal of the Royal Netherlands

Volumn 115, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 275-285

  Van Belzen, Ruud ^a   Klein, René A ^a   Smeets, Wilberth J J ^b   Spek, Anthony L ^b   Benedix, Roland ^c   Elsevier, Cornelis J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c LEIPZIG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2242434239     PISSN: 01650513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/recl.19961150504     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. R. van Asselt, C.J. Elsevier, W.J.J. Smeets, A.L. Spek, R. Benedix, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 113, 88 (1994).
2. a R. van Asselt, C.J. Elsevier, Organometallics 11, 1999 (1992);
3. b R. van Asselt, C.J. Elsevier, Tetrahedron 50, 323 (1994);
4. c R. van Asselt, E.E.C.G. Gielens, R.E. Rülke, C.J. Elsevier, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 15, 1203 (1993);
5. d R. van Asselt, E.E.C.G. Gielens, R.E. Rülke, K. Vrieze, C.J. Elsevier, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 977 (1994).
6. R. van Asselt, C.J. Elsevier, J. Mol. Cat. 65, L13 (1991).
7. F. Ragaini, S. Cenini, S. Tollari, J. Mol. Cat. 85, L1 (1993).
8. a J. Reinhold, R. Benedix, P. Birner, H. Hennig, Z. Chem. 17, 115 (1977);
9. b J. Reinhold, R. Benedix, P. Birner, H. Hennis, Inorg. Chim. Acta 33, 209 (1979).
10. M.S. Kharasch, R.C. Seyler, F.R. Mayo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 882 (1938).
11. G. Tuchtenhagen, K. Ruhlman, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 174, 711 (1968).
12. A.L. Spek, J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 578 (1988).
13. N. Walker, D. Stuart, Acta Cryst. A39, 158 (1983).
14. G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXS86. Program for crystal structure determination. Univ. of Göttingen, Federal Republic of Germany, 1986.
15. P. T. Beurskens, G. Admiraal, G. Beurskens, W.P. Bosman, S. Garcia-Granda, R.O. Gould, J.M.M. Smits, C. Smykalla, The DIRDIF Program System. Technical report of the Crystallography Laboratory, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1992.
16. D.T. Cromer, J.B. Mann, Acta Cryst. A24, 321 (1968).
17. D.T. Cromer, D. Liberman, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 1891 (1970).
18. G.M. Sheldrick, SHELX76. Crystal structure analysis package. Univ. of Cambridge, England, 1976.
19. A.L. Spek, Acta Cryst. A46, C34 (1990).
20. J.A. Pople, D.P. Santry, G.A. Segal, J. Chem. Phys. 43, s129 (1965).
21. a R. Fletcher, Atomic Energy Res. Establ. Report AERE-R 7125 (1972);
22. b R. Fletcher, Comput. J. 13, 317 (1970).
23. a P. Birner, H.J. Köhler, C. Weiss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 27, 347 (1974);
24. b P. Birner, H.J. Köhler, C. Weiss, Internat. J. Quantum Chem. IX 917 (1975).
25. C. Nieke, J. Reinhold, Theor. Chim. Acta 65, 99 (1984).
26. E.J. MacPherson, J.G. Smith, Tetrahedron Lett. 27, 2645 (1971).
27. A.T. Mason, Ber. 19, 112 (1886).
28. K. Heyns, W. Stumme, Chem. Ber. 12, 181 (1956).
29. P. Belser, G. Desbiolles, U. Ochsenbein, A. Von Zelewsky, Helv. Chim. Acta 63, 523 (1980).
30. P.L. Julian, E.W. Meyer, A. Magnani, W. Cole, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 67, 1203 (1945).
31. G.J. Gainsford, A.D. Woolhouse, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 857 (1978).
32. This analysis gives the following values for the relevant parameters for residue 1 and 2: puckering amplitude (Q) = 0.339(4) and 0.374(4) Å, Θ = 68.4(7) and 114.2(6)° and Φ = 266.8(6) and 91.3(6)° respectivily. J.C.A. Boeyens, J. Cryst. Mol. Struct. 8, 317 (1978).
33. G.R. Desiraju, T. Gavezzotti, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 621 (1989).
34. C.A. Hunter, J.K.M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 5525 (1990).
35. G. van Koten, K. Vrieze, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 21, 151 (1982).
36. Puckering amplitude (Q) = 0.206(13) Å, Θ = 114.4(36)° and Φ = 90.3(40)°.
37. These results were verified by a NOE-difference measurement.
38. Reported chemical shifts in the case of camphorquinone diimines show a difference of at least 2 ppm between an E and a Z configuration, see Ref. 1.
39. Even though the protons give a doublet the coalescence temperature can be established because of the large difference in chemical shift values.
40. 13C-NMR on C(7) and C(11) gave the same activation energy but was less accurate, viz. 37.6 (±0.8) kJ/mol.
41. For conformational stability of bridged biphenyls at ambient temperatures, energy barriers of about 80 kJ/mol are necessary, see C. Jaime, J. Font, J. Org. Chem. 55, 2637 (1990).
42. A.M. Pyle, M.Y. Chiang, J.K. Barton, Inorg. Chem. 29, 4487 (1990).
43. R. Benedix, H. Hennig, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 577, 23 (1989).