Communicating the future: Report of the Research Roadmap Panel for Public Communication of Science and Technology in the twenty-first century

Science Communication

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 194-211

  Borchelt, Rick E ^a,b  

^a Dept of Science and Technology Projects   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22344456594     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547001023002006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cialdini, R. 1997. Professionally responsible communication with the public: Giving psychology a way. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23:675-83.
2. DiBella, S. M., A. J. Ferri, and A.B. Padderud. 1991. Scientists' reasons for consenting to mass media interviews: A national survey. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 68:740-49.
3. Dunwoody, S., D. Harp, R. Barth, and E. Crane. 1998. Directory of science communication courses & programs in the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Board of Regents. Available: http://www.journalism.wisc.edu/dsc/index.html.
4. Dunwoody, S., and M. Ryan. 1983. Public information persons as mediators between scientists and journalists. Journalism Quarterly 60:647-56.
5. Friedman, S., S. Dunwoody, and C. Rogers, eds. 1999. Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Lewenstein, B. 2000. An American historical perspective on public communication of science. Paper presented at the Conference on Science Communication, Education, and the History of Science, London, 12-13 July.
7. McCombs, M. E., and D. S. Shaw. 1993. The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication 43:58-67.
8. Miller, J. 1986. Reaching the attentive and interested publics for science. In Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news, edited by S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, 55-69. New York: Free Press.
9. National Science Board (NSB). 1998. The National Science Board strategic plan. NSB 98-215. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
10. _. 2000a. Communicating science and technology in the public interest. NSB 00-99. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
11. _. 2000b. Science and engineering indicators 2000. NSB 001. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
12. Nelkin, D. 1995. Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. Rev. ed. New York: Freeman.
13. Prewitt, K. 1982. The public and science policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values 36:5-14.
14. Priest, S. H. 2001. Misplaced faith: Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Science Communication 23:97-110.
15. Rainie, L., and D. Packel. 2001. More online, doing more. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org.
16. Stempel, G. H., III, T. Hargrove, and J. P. Bernt. 2000. Relation of growth of use of the Internet to changes in media use from 1995 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (1): 71-79.
17. Tremayne, M., and S. Dunwoody. 2001. Interactivity, information processing, and learning on the World Wide Web. Science Communication 23:111-63.
18. Weigold, M. F. 2001. Communicating science: A review of the literature. Science Communication 23:164-94.
19. Ziman, J. 1992. Not knowing, needing to know, and wanting to know. In When science meets the public, edited by B. V. Lewenstein, 13-20. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.