Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in Karachi

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 199-202

  Kayani, Naila ^b   Bhurgri, Yasmin ^a,b,c  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

^b Karachi Cancer Registry ^*

^c JINNAH SINDH MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; PROGESTERONE;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISCHARGE; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CALCIFICATION; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; COMEDO; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NECROSIS; PAKISTAN; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; REVIEW; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HOSPITAL LABORATORY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARD;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABORATORIES, HOSPITAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PAKISTAN; PATHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL;

EID: 22344451176     PISSN: 00309982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Lagios MD, Margolin FR, Westdahl PR, Rose MR. Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ: frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrence. Cancer 1989;63:618-24.
2. Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman JR, Colburn WJ, Barth A, Gierson ED, et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Lancet 1995;345:1154-7.
3. Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR, Eusebi V, Faverly D, van de Vijver MJ, et al. DCIS: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994;11:167-80.
4. Poller DN, Silverstein MJ, Galea M, Locker AP, Elston CW, Blamey RW, et al. Ideas in pathology. DCIS of the breast: a proposal for a new simplified histological classification association between cellular proliferation and c-erbB-2 protein expression. Mod Pathol 1994;7:257-62.
5. Camus MG, Joshi MG, Mackarem G, Lee AK, Rossi RL, Munson JL, et al. DCIS of the male breast. Cancer 1994;74:1289-93.
6. Feuer EJ, Wun LM. How much of the recent rise in breast cancer incidence can be explained by increases in mammography utilization? A dynamic population model approach. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:1423-36.
7. Ward BA, McKhann CF, Ravikumar TS. Ten-year follow-up of breast carcinoma in situ in Connecticut. Arch Surg 1992;127:1392-5.
8. Bush DS, Remington PL, Reeves M, Phillips JL. In situ breast cancer correlates with mammography use, Wisconsin: 1980-1992. Wis Med J 1994;93:483-4.
9. Garfinkel L, Boring CC, Heath CW Jr. Changing trends: an overview of breast cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer 1994;74 (Suppl 1):222-7.
10. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson C. Incidence of and treatment for DCIS of the breast. JAMA 1996;275:913-18.
11. Simon MS, Lemanne D, Schwartz AG, Martino S, Swanson GM. Recent trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer in the Detroit metropolitan area (1975-1988). Cancer 1993;71:769-74.
12. Kessler LG, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the breast cancer burden to U.S. women 1900-2000. Prev Med 1991;20:170-82.
13. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavassoli FA, Fechner RE, Kempson RL, Gelman R, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:1133-43.
14. Mariuzzi GM, Mariuzzi L, Mombello A, Santinelli A, Valli M, Rahal D, et al. Quantitative study of ductal breast cancer progression. Morphometric evaluation of phenotypical changes occurring in benign and preinvasive epithelial lesions. Pathol Res Pract 1994;190:1056-65.
15. Lennington WJ, Jensen RA, Dalton LW, Page DL. DCIS of the breast. Heterogeneity of individual lesions. Cancer 1994;73:118-24.
16. Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, et al (eds.). Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods;IARC Scientific Publications No. 95 Lyon IARC, 1991.
17. Parkin DM, Chen VW, Ferley J, (eds.). Comparability and quality control in cancer registration, IARC Technical Report No. 19, Lyon IARC, 1994.
18. World Health Organization, International classification of diseases for oncology, Ed. 2, Geneva, WHO 1990.
19. Rothwell DJ (ed.). Systemic nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED) microglossary for surgical pathology, College of American Pathologists, Library of Congress Number 80, 68528 WHO, 1992, International classification of diseases, 10th Rev., Geneva: WHO 1992.
20. Nemoto T, Vana J, Bedwani RN, Baker HW, McGregor FH, Murphy GP. Management and survival of female breast cancer: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Cancer 1980;45:2917-24.
21. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbach R. Mortality among women with DCIS of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:953-8.
22. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:6-29.
23. Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Colburn WJ. Coordinated biopsy team: surgical, pathologic and radiologic issues. In: Silverstein MJ, ed. DCIS of the breast. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1997, pp.333-42.
24. Silverstein MJ. DCIS of the breast. BMJ 1998;317:734-9.
25. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Jensen RA, Schuyler PA. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer 1995;76:1197-1200.