Teaching principles of cardiovascular function in a medical student laboratory

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 118-127

  Gupta, Sanjaya ^a,b   Westfall, Thomas C ^a   Lechner, Andrew J ^a   Knuepfer, Mark M ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Adrenoceptors; Arterial pressure regulation; Cardiac contractility; Cardiovascular laboratory; Heart rate regulation; Hemodynamics; Skeletal muscle blood flow regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 22344440347     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00052.2004     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Brown JK and Taylor P. Muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists. In: Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (10th ed.), edited by Gilman AG. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
2. Carroll RG. Cardiovascular pressure-flow relationships: what should be taught? Adv Physiol Educ 25: 80-86, 2001.
3. Davis MJ and Gore RW. Determinants of cardiac function: simulation of a dynamic cardiac pump for physiology instruction. Adv Physiol Educ 25: 13-35, 2001.
4. Hoffman B. Catecholamines, sympathomimetic drugs, and adrenergic receptor antagonists. In: Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (10th ed.), edited by Gilman AG. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
5. Hoffman B and Taylor P. Neurotransmission: the autonomic and somatic motor nervous systems. In Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (10th ed.), edited by Gilman AG. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
6. PETA. Medical school dog labs: torture, not teaching. Animal Times, Fall 2000.
7. Modell HI. Can technology replace live preparations in student laboratories? Adv Physiol Educ 256: 18-20, 1989.