The GRAIDS Trial: The development and evaluation of computer decision support for cancer genetic risk assessment in primary care

Annals of Human Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 218-227

  Emery, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cancer genetics; Complex interventions; Primary care computer decision support

Indexed keywords

CANCER; HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 22344433425     PISSN: 03014460     EISSN: 14645033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03014460500074921     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Acheson L. 2003. Fostering applications of genetics in primary care: what will it take? Genet Med 5:63-65.
2. Berry DA, Parmigiani G, Sanchez J, Schildkraut J, Winer E. 1997. Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history [see comments]. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:227-238.
3. Burgers JS, Grol RP, Zaat JO, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HG. 2003. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract 53:15-19.
4. Burke W, Emery J. 2002. Genetics education for primary-care providers. Nat Rev Genet 3:561-566.
5. Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N, Wu A, Wilson M, Abboud P, Rubin HR. 1999. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? J Am Med Assoc, 282:1458-1465.
6. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. 2000. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 321:694-696.
7. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. 1994. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73:643-651.
8. Coulson AS, Glasspool DW, Fox J, Emery J. 2001. RAGs: A novel approach to computerized genetic risk assessment and decision support from pedigrees. Meth Inf Med 40:315-322.
9. Cyrillic (21). 1997. Cyrillic version 2.1. Oxford: Cherwell Scientific Publishing.
10. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, Rousseau N, Grimshaw J, Parkin D, Purves I. 2002. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 325:941.
11. Emery J, Watson E, Rose P, Andermann A. 1999. A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Family Practice 16:426-445.
12. Emery J, Walton R, Coulson A, Glasspool D, Ziebland S, Fox J. 1999. A qualitative evaluation of computer support for recording and interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care (RAGs) using simulated cases. Br Med J 319:32-36.
13. Emery J, Walton R, Murphy M, Austoker J, Yudkin P, Chapman C, Coulson A, Glasspool D, Fox J. 2000. Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases. Br Med J 321:28-32.
14. Emery J, Lucassen A, Murphy M. 2001. Common hereditary cancers and implications for primary care. Lancet 258:56-63.
15. Fox J, Johns N, Lyons C, Rahmanzadeh A, Thomson R, Wilson P. 1997. PROforma: a general technology for clinical decision support systems. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 54:59-67.
16. GRAIDS. 2004. The GRAIDS Research Programme http://www.graids.apbenson. com/, 8 June 2004.
17. Grimshaw J, Russell I. 1993. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342:1317-1322.
18. Hayflick SJ, Eiff MP, Carpenter L, Steinberger J. 1998. Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services. Genet Med 1:13-21.
19. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. 1998. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review [see comment]. J Am Med Assoc 280:1339-1346.
20. Kerber RA, Slattery ML. 1997. Comparison of self-reported and database-linked family history of cancer data in a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 146:244-248.
21. Kolb SE, Aguilar MC, Dinenberg M, Kaye CI. 1999. Genetics education for primary care providers in community health settings. J Community Health 24:45-59.
22. Lipkus IM, Hollands JG. 1999. The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 149-163.
23. Marteau T, Dormandy E, Michie S. 2001. A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations 4:99-108.
24. Mendel software. 2004. http://www.genetics.ucla.edu/software/, 8 June 2004.
25. Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ, MacIntosh C, Sharp DJ. 2000. Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 320:686-690.
26. Rich EC, Burke W, Heaton CJ, Haga S, Pinsky L, Short MP, Acheson L. 2004, Reconsidering the family history in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 19:273-280.
27. Rimer BK, Glassman B. 1999. Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 140-148.
28. Suther S, Goodson P. 2003. Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 5:70-76.
29. Walton R, Dovey S, Harvey E, Freemantle N. 1999. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 318:984-990.
30. Watson E, Clements A, Lucassen A, Yudkin P, Mackay J, Austoker J. 2002. Education improves general practitioner (GP) management of familial breast/ovarian cancer: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial. J Med Genet 39:779-781.
31. Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. 1997. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. Can Med Assoc J 156:1705-1712.
32. Yoon PW, Scheuner MT, Peterson-Oehlke KL, Gwinn M, Faucett A, Khoury MJ. 2002. Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventive medicine? Genet Med 4:304-310.