Pregnancy-associated cervical cancer: Obstetric outcomes

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 269-276

  Dalrymple, John L ^a   Gilbert, William M ^a   Leiserowitz, Gary S ^a   Cress, Rosemary ^b   Xing, Guibo ^a   Danielsen, Beate ^c   Smith, Lloyd H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b California Cancer Registry   (United States)

^c Health Information Solutions   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Obstetric outcomes; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS MORTALITY; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREGNANCY; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; FETAL DEATH; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, NEOPLASTIC; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 22244486666     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767050500123962     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Antonelli NM, Dotters DJ, Katz VL, et al. Cancer in pregnancy - a review of the literature. Parts 1 and 2. Obstet Gynecol Survery 1996;51:125-142.
2. Shivvers SA, Miller DS. Preinvasive and invasive breast and cervical cancer prior to or during pregnancy. Clinics in Perinatology 1997;24:369-389.
3. Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix associated with pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:735-746.
4. Smith LH, Danielsen B, Allen ME, et al. Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1128-1135.
5. Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:9-14.
6. Smith LH, Dalrymple JL, Leiserowitz GS, et al. Obstetrical deliveries associated with maternal malignancy in California, 1992 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1504-1513.
7. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases. Ninth revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
8. Shambaugh E, Ries L, Young J, et al. SEER Extent of Disease 1998 Codes and Coding Instructions, 2nd ed. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1992.
9. Seiffert J, editor. SEER Program: Comparative staging guide for cancer, version 1.1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1993.
10. Agresti A, Mehta CR, Patel NR. Exact inference for contingency tables with ordered categories. J Amer Stat Assoc 1990;85:453-458.
11. Greer BE, Easterling TR, McLennan DA, et al. Fetal and maternal considerations in the management of stage IB cervical cancer during pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 1989;34:61-65.
12. Monk BJ, Montz FJ. Invasive cervical cancer complication intrauterine pregnancy: Treatment with radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:199-203.
13. Duggan B, Muderspach LI, Roman LD, et al. Cervical cancer in pregnancy: Reporting on planned delay in therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:598-602.
14. Sorosky JI, Squatrito R, Ndubisi BU, et al. Stage I squamous cell cervical carcinoma in pregnancy: Planned delay in therapy awaiting fetal maturity. Gynecol Oncol 1995;59:207-210.
15. Van der vange N, Weverling GJ, Ketting BW, et al. The prognosis of cervical cancer associated with pregnancy: A matched cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1022-1026.
16. Sood AK, Sorosky JI, Krogman S, et al. Surgical management of cervical cancer complicating pregnancy: A case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 1996;63:294-298.
17. Takushi M, Moromizato H, Sakumoto K, et al. Management of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with pregnancy: Outcome of intentional delay in treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2002;87:185-189.
18. Goff BA, Paley PJ, Koh W, et al. Cancer in the pregnant patient. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, editors. Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. pp 501-528.
19. Sood AK, Sorosky JI. Invasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. How to manage the dilemma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998;25:343-352.
20. Montz JF. Impact of therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1129-1136.
21. Crane JMG. Pregnancy outcome after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-1062.
22. de Haas I, Harlow BL, Cramer DW, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:1290-1296.
23. Parker JD, Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 1994;4:271-278.
24. Zemlickis D, Lishner M, Degendorfer P, et al. Maternal and fetal outcome after invasive cervical cancer in pregnancy. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1956-1961.