Changepoint alternatives to the NOAEL

Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 197-211

  West, R Webster ^a   Kodell, Ralph L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Onset of trend; Profile likelihood

Indexed keywords

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; ECOTOXICOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 22244481849     PISSN: 10857117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/108571105X46525     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anraku, K. (1999), "An Information Criterion for Parameters Under a Simple Order Restriction," Biometrika, 86, 141-152.
2. Bauer, P., Rohmel, J., Maurer, W., and Hothorn, L. (1998), "Testing Strategies in Multi-Dose Experiments Including Active Control," Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2133-2146.
3. Bretz, F., and Hothorn, L. A. (2000), "A Powerful Alternative to William's Test with Application to Toxicological Dose-Response Relationships for Normally Distributed Data," Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 7, 135-154.
4. Carroll, R. J., Roeder, K., and Wasserman, L. (1999), "Flexible Measurement Error Models," Biometrics, 55, 44-54.
5. Chen, J. (1998), "Testing for a Changepoint in Linear Regression Models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 27, 2481-2493.
6. Cox, C. (1987), "Threshold Dose Response Models in Toxicology," Biometrics, 43, 511-523.
7. Crump, K. S. (1984), "A New Method for Determining Alternative Daily Intakes," Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 4, 854-871.
8. Dunnett, C. W. (1964), "New Tables for Multiple Comparisons With Control," Biometrics, 20, 482-491.
9. Feder, P. I. (1975a), "On Asymptotic Distribution Theory in Segmented Regression Problems - Identified Case," The Annals of Statistics, 3, 49-83.
10. Feder, P. I. (1975b), "The Log-Likelihood Ratio in Segmented Regression," The Annals of Statistics, 3, 84-97.
11. Hirotsu, C., and Marumo, K. (2002), "Changepoint Analysis as a Method for Isotonic Inference," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 29, 125-138.
12. Hothorn, L. A., and Hauschke, D. (2000), "Identifying the Maximum Safe Dose: A Multiple Testing Approach," Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10, 15-30.
13. Julious S. A. (2001), "Inference and Estimation in a Changepoint Regression Problem," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. D, 50, 51-61.
14. Kimmel, C. A., and Gaylor, D. W. (1988), "Issues in Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, 8, 15-20.
15. Kodell, R. L., and West, R. W. (1993), "Upper Confidence Limits on Excess Risk for Quantitative Responses," Risk Analysis, 13, 177-182.
16. Leisenring, W., and Ryan, L. (1992), "Statistical Properties of the NOAEL," Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmocology, 15, 161-171.
17. NRC (National Research Council) (2000), Methods for Developing Spacecraft Water Exposure Guidelines, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Seber, G. A. F., and Wild, C. J. (1989), Nonlinear Regression, New York: Wiley.
19. Tamhane, A. C., Hochberg, Y., and Dunnett, C. W. (1996), "Multiple Test Procedures for Dose Finding," Biometrics, 52, 21-37.
20. Tamhane, A. C., Dunnett, C. W., Green J. W., and Wetherington, J. D. (2001), "Multiple Test Procedures for Identifying the Maximum Safe Dose," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 835-843.
21. Williams, D. A. (1971), "A Test for Differences Between Treatment Means When Several Dose Levels are Compared With a Zero Dose Control," Biometrics, 27, 103-117.
22. Ulm, K. (1999), "Nonparametric Analysis of Dose-Response Relationships," Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 895, 223-231.