Beneficial effects of biatrial pacing on cardiac function in patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome

Circulation Journal

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 831-836

  Matsumoto, Katsumi ^a   Ishikawa, Toshiyuki ^a   Sumita, Shinichi ^a   Matsushita, Kohei ^a   Kawasaki, Noriko ^a   Kobayashi, Tsukasa ^a   Uchino, Kazuaki ^a   Kimura, Kazuo ^a   Umemura, Satoshi ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Biatrial pacing; Cardiac function; Intra atrial conduction delay; Sick sinus syndrome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BRADYCARDIA; BRADYCARDIA TACHYCARDIA SYNDROME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY SINUS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE CONTRACTION; HEART RIGHT ATRIUM; HUMAN; MALE; P WAVE; TACHYCARDIA; WAVEFORM;

AGED; ATRIAL APPENDAGE; ATRIAL FUNCTION; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRADYCARDIA; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; SYNDROME; TACHYCARDIA;

EID: 22244437605     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.69.831     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation: Analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 469-473.
2. Roy D, Talajic M, Dorian P, Connolly S, Eisenberg MJ, Green M, et al for the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation Investigators: Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 913-920.
3. Kochiadakis GE, Marketou ME, Igoumenidis NE, Chrysostomakis SI, Mavrakis HE, Kaleboubas MD, et al. Amiodarone, sotalol, or propafenone in atrial fibrillation: Which is preferred to maintain normal sinus rhythm? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 1883-1887.
4. Komatsu T, Nakamura S, Suzuki O, Horiuchi D, Yomogida K, Okumura K. Long-term prognosis of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation depends on their response to antiarrhythmic therapy. Circ J 2004; 68: 729-733.
5. Kato T, Yamashita T, Sagara K, Iinuma H, Fu LT. Progressive nature of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Observations from a 14-year follow-up study. Circ J 2004; 68: 568-572.
6. Fragakis N, Shakespeare CF, Lloyd G, Simon R, Bostock J, Holt D, et al. Reversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation by internal cardioversion followed by biatrial pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002; 25: 278-286.
7. Enjoji Y, Sugi K, Noro M, Nakao T, Tezuka N, Takami M, et al. Evaluation of bi-atrial pacing and single site pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circ J 2002; 66: 70-74.
8. Gilligan DM, Fuller IA, Clemo HF, Shepard RK, Dan D, Wood MA, et al. The acute effects of biatrial pacing on atrial depolarization and repolarization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 1113-1120.
9. Fan K, Lee KL, Chiu CS, Lee JW, He GW, Cheung D, et al. Effects of biatrial pacing in prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2000; 102: 755-760.
10. Levy T, Fotopoulos G, Walker S, Rex S, Octave M, Paul V, et al. Randomized controlled study investigating the effect of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2000; 102: 1382-1387.
11. Endoh Y, Nakamura A, Suzuki T, Mizuno M, Takara A, Ota Y, et al. Clinical significance of prolonged P wave width after right atrial appendage pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Circ J 2003; 67: 485-489.
12. Levy T, Jenkins GH, Walker S, Grieve L, Webb C, Buckley MG, et al. Does the mechanism of action of biatrial pacing for atrial fibrillation involve change in cardiac haemodynamics? Assessment by Doppler echocardiography and natriuretic peptide measurements. Europace 2000; 2: 127-135.
13. Dobrowska-Kugacka A, Lewicka-Nowak E, Kutarski A, Zagozdzon D, Swiatecka G. Hemodynamic effects of alternative atrial pacing sites in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 278-283.
14. Doi A, Takagi M, Toda I, Yoshiyama M, Takeuchi K, Yoshikawa J. Acute haemodynamic benefits of biatrial atrioventricular sequential pacing: Comparison with single atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing. Heart 2004; 90: 411-418.
15. Ishikawa T, Sumita S, Kimura K, Kikuchi M, Kosuge M, Kuji N, et al. Prediction of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 1365-1371.
16. Rosado L, Tyers F, Cooper J. Actuarial analysis of patient survival as a function of pacemaker type pacing (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987; 10: 409.
17. Hagens VE, Ranchor AV, Van Sonderen E, Bosker HA, Kamp O, Tijssen JG, et al. Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 241-247.
18. Flegel KM, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Risk of stroke in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Lancet 1987; 1: 526-527.
19. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershats H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact on atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: The Framingham heart study. Circulation 1998; 98: 946-952.
20. Shimizu A, Fukatani M, Tanigawa M, Mori M, Hashiba K. Intraatrial conduction delay and fragmented atrial activity in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Jpn Circ J 1989; 20: 1023-1030.
21. Ishikawa T, Kimura K, Nihei T, Usui T, Kashiwagi M, Ishii M. Relationship between diastolic mitral regurgitation and PQ intervals or cardiac function in patients implanted with DDD pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991; 14: 1797-1802.