Power-assisted lipoplasty versus traditional suction-assisted lipoplasty: Comparative evaluation and analysis of output [3]

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-

  Fodor, Peter B ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WETTING AGENT;

BODY FAT; BODY REGIONS; EMULSION; EVALUATION; EXTRACTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; LIPOSUCTION; POWER ASSISTED LIPOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; THIGH; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASOUND; VELOCITY; VOLUMETRY;

HUMANS; LIPECTOMY; SUCTION; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 22244436556     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-004-0070-0     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. B Fodor Peter 1999 Power-assisted lipoplasty (PAL): A clinical pilot study comparing PAL to traditional lipoplasty (TL) Aesth Plast Surg J 23 379 385
2. B Fodor Peter 2001 Power-assisted lipoplasty Aesth Surg J 21 90 92
3. B Fodor Peter 2003 Power-assisted lipoplasty Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 8 23 27
4. B Fodor Peter 1995 Wetting solutions in aspirative lipoplasty: A plea for safety in liposuction Aesth Plast Surg J 19 379 380
5. N Scuderi R DeVita F d'Adrea M Vonella 1987 Nuove prospective nella liposuzione: La lipoemulsificazione Giorn Chir Plast Riconstr Estet 2 1