Comparing F0 discrimination in sequential and simultaneous conditions (L)

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 41-44

  Micheyl, Christophe ^a   Oxenham, Andrew J ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES;

FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES; HARMONIC COMPLEX TONES;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HARMONIC COMPLEX TONE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENTIAL COMPARISON TASK; SIGNAL DETECTION; SOUND; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HEARING; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS;

EID: 22144496105     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.1929228     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Carlyon, R. P., and Shackleton, T. M. (1994). "Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3541-3554.
2. Chuang, C. K., and Wang, W. S. (1978). "Psychophysical pitch biases related to vowel quality, intensity difference, and sequential order," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1004-1014.
3. Dai H., and Green, D. M. (1992). "Auditory intensity perception: Successive versus simultaneous, across-channel discriminations," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2845-2854.
4. Darwin, C. J. (1992). "Listening to two things at once," in The Auditory Processing of Speech, from Sounds to Words, edited by M. E. H. Schouten (Mouton de Gruyer, New York), pp. 133-145.
5. Demany, L., and Semal, C. (1992). "Detection of inharmonicity in dichotic pure-tone dyads," Hear. Res. 61, 161-166.
6. Durlach, N. I., and Braida, L. D. (1969). "Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 372-383.
7. Durlach, N. I., Braida, L. D., and Ito, Y. (1986). "Towards a model for discrimination of broadband signals," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 63-72.
8. Faulkner, A. (1985). "Pitch discrimination of harmonic complex signals: Residue pitch of multiple component discrimination?" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1993-2004.
9. Gockel, H., Carlyon, R. P., and Plack, C. J. (2004). "Across- frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: Questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1092-1104.
10. Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, New York).
11. Grimault, N., Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., and Collet, L. (2002). "Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm," Percept. Psychophys. 64, 189-197.
12. Jesteadt, W., and Bilger, R. C. (1974). "Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 1266-1276.
13. Jesteadt, W., and Sims, S. L. (1975). "Decision processes in frequency discrimination," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 1161-1168.
14. Kaplan, H. L., Macmillan, N. A., and Creelman, C. D. (1978). "Tables of d′ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms," Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 10, 796-813.
15. Macmillan, N. A., and Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
16. Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., and Creelman, C. D. (1977). "The psychophysics of categorical perception," Psychol. Rev. 84, 452-471.
17. Meddis, R., and O'Mard, L. (1997). "A unitary model of pitch perception," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820.
18. Micheyl, C., and Messing, P., "Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and correct-response probabilities in the 4IAX paradigm".
19. Micheyl, C., and Oxenham, A. J. (2004). "Sequential F0 comparisons between resolved and unresolved harmonics: No evidence for translation noise between two pitch mechanisms," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3038-3050.
20. Moore, B. C. J., and Glasberg, B. R. (1990). "Frequency discrimination of complex tone with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2163-2177.
21. Noreen, D. L. (1981). "Optimal decision rules for some common psychophysical paradigms, in Mathematical Psychology and Psychophysiology (Proceedings of the Symposium in Applied Mathematics of the American Mathematical Society and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 13), edited by S. Grossberg (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI), pp. 237-279.
22. Plack, C. J., and Carlyon, R. P. (1995), "Differences in frequency modulation detection and fundamental frequency discrimination between complex tones consisting of resolved and unresolved harmonics" J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1355-1364.
23. Roberts, B., and Brunstrom, J. M. (2003). "Spectral pattern, harmonic relations, and the perceptual grouping of low-numbered components," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2118-2134.
24. Rousseau, B., and Ennis, D. M. (2001). "A Thurstonian model for the dual pair (4IAX) discrimination method," Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1083-1090.
25. Singh, P. G., and Hirsh, I. J. (1992). "Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 2650-2661.