'Expectations in reproduction: Society and the family'

Human Fertility

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 81-83

  Haimes, Erica ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADOPTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMOTIONALITY; FAMILY LIFE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; IDENTITY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LAW; MEDICAL RECORD; MORALITY; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PUBLIC OPINION; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 22144481657     PISSN: 14647273     EISSN: 17428149     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14647270500162440     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell
2. Haimes, E. (1990). Recreating the family? Policy considerations relating to the new reproductive technologies. In M. McNeil, et al. (Eds). The new reproductive technologies (pp. 154-172). London: Macmillan.
3. Haimes, E. (2002). The provision of donor insemination for lesbian couples: research evidence and implications. In D. Healy (Ed), Reproductive medicine in the twenty-first century (pp. 86-96). London: Parthenon Publishing.
4. Haimes, E. (2002). When transgressions become transparent: limiting family forms in assisted conception. Journal of Law and Medicine, 9(4), 438-448.
5. Morgan, D.H.J. (2001). Family sociology in from the fringe: the three 'economies' of family life. In R. Burgess & A. Murcott (Eds), Developments in sociology (pp. 227-247). Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
6. Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate Citizenship: private decisions and public dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press