Autonomy in stroke rehabilitation: The perceptions of care providers in nursing homes

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 36-50

  Proot, Ireen m ^a   Abu Saad, Huda Huijer ^b   van Oorsouw, Gijs G J ^c   Stevens, Jos Jam ^d  

^a Institute for Bioethics   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Nursing Home St Camillus Land van Gelre en Gulick   (Netherlands)

^d NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

changing autonomy; independence; self care; self determination

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NETHERLANDS; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; NURSING HOME; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARD;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NETHERLANDS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING HOMES; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 22144476535     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733002ne479oa     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson R. The aftermath of stroke. The experiences of patients and their families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
2. Bergman L, van der Meulen JHP, Limburg M, Habbema JDF. Costs of medical care after first-ever stroke in the Netherlands. Stroke 1995; 26: 1830-1836.
3. Johnstone M. The stroke patient: a team approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1987.
4. Rice-Oxley M, Turner-Stokes L. Effectiveness of brain injury rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13 (Suppl 1): 7-24.
5. Indredavik B, Bakke F, Sl⊘rdahl SA, Rokseth R, Håheim LL. Stroke unit treatment: 10-year follow-up. Stroke 1999; 30: 1524-1527.
6. Wade DT. Stroke: rehabilitation and long-term care. Lancet 1992; 339: 791-795.
7. Sim J. Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 3-10.
8. Proot IM, Crebolder HFJM, Huijer Abu-Saad H, ter Meulen RHJ. Autonomy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes: a concept analysis. Scand J Caring Sci 1998; 12: 139-145.
9. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
10. Mill JS. On liberty (First published 1859). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985.
11. Miller BL. Autonomy and the refusal of lifesaving treatment. Hastings Cent Rep 1981; 11(4): 22-28.
12. Taylor C. The malaise of modernity. Don Mills: Stoddart Publishing, 1991. (Republished as: The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.)
13. Agich GJ. Autonomy and long-term care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
14. Banja JD. Ethical issues in staff development. In: Durgin CJ, Schmidt ND, Fryer LJ eds. Staff development and clinical intervention in brain injury. Gaitersburg, MD: Aspen, 1993: 23-41.
15. Orem DE. Nursing: concepts of practice, fifth edition. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1995.
16. Pool A. Autonomie, afhankelijkheid en langdurige zorgverlening (Autonomy, dependence and long-term care). Utrecht: Lemma, 1995.
17. Van Campen C, Kerkstra A. Kwaliteit van leven van somatische verpleeghuispatiënten: Een begripsverheldering en overzicht van meetinstrumenten (Quality of life of medical nursing home patients: a summary of concepts and measurement scales). Utrecht: NIVEL, 1995.
18. Van der Wulp JC. Verstoring en verwerking in verpleeghuizen (Impairments and their resolution in nursing homes). Nijkerk: Intro, 1986.
19. Tronto JC. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge, 1994.
20. Taes CGJ, van Campen C, Kerkstra A. Ervaren autonomie en ervaren veiligheid bij somatische verpleeghuisbewoners (Experienced autonomy and experienced safety for medical nursing home patients). Kwaliteit en Zorg (Quality and Care) 1996; 4(2): 52-62.
21. Mattiasson A, Andersson L. Quality of nursing home care assessed by competent nursing home patients. In: Mattiasson A ed. Autonomy in nursing home settings: study 5. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, 1995: 1-14.
22. Proot IM, Crebolder HFJM, Huijer Abu-Saad H, Macor THGM, ter Meulen RHJ. Facilitating and constraining factors on autonomy: the views of stroke patients on admission into nursing homes. Clin Nurs Res 2000; 9: 460-478.
23. Proot IM, Huijer Abu-Saad H, De Esch-Janssen WP, Crebolder HFJM, ter Meulen RHJ. Patient autonomy during rehabilitation: the experiences of stroke patients in nursing homes. Int J Nurs Stud 2000; 37: 267-276.
24. Proot IM, Crebolder HFJM, Huijer Abu-Saad H, Macor THGM, ter Meulen RHJ. Stroke patients’ needs and experiences regarding autonomy at discharge from nursing home. Patient Educ Counsel 2000; 41: 275-283.
25. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
26. Proot IM. Protocol, autonomie en verantwoordelijkheid in de zorg voor CVA-patiënten (Protocol, autonomy and responsibility in the care of stroke patients) [Thesis]. Maastricht: Maastricht University, 1994.
27. Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989.
28. Sim J, Sharp K. A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. Int J Nurs Stud 1998; 35: 23-31.
29. Deci EL. The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1980.
30. Kirkevold M. The role of nursing in the rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: towards a unified theoretical perspective. Adv Nurs Sci 1997; 19(4): 55-64.