-
1
-
-
0026321680
-
Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report
-
Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991;146:278-82.
-
(1991)
J. Urol.
, vol.146
, pp. 278-282
-
-
Clayman, R.V.1
Kavoussi, L.R.2
Soper, N.J.3
-
2
-
-
0031441795
-
Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
-
Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997;226:483-9.
-
(1997)
Ann. Surg.
, vol.226
, pp. 483-489
-
-
Flowers, J.L.1
Jacobs, S.2
Cho, E.3
-
3
-
-
0032844159
-
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy
-
Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy. J Urol 1999;161:1776-80.
-
(1999)
J. Urol.
, vol.161
, pp. 1776-1780
-
-
Abbou, C.C.1
Cicco, A.2
Gasman, D.3
-
4
-
-
0033822289
-
Laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy: A 9 year experience
-
Dunn MD, Portis A, Shalhav AS, et al. Laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy: a 9 year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153-6.
-
(2000)
J. Urol.
, vol.164
, pp. 1153-1156
-
-
Dunn, M.D.1
Portis, A.2
Shalhav, A.S.3
-
6
-
-
85030188478
-
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: The Washington University experience
-
Mc Dougall EM, Clayman RV, Elashry OM. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Washington University experience. J Urol 1996;155:1160-5.
-
(1996)
J. Urol.
, vol.155
, pp. 1160-1165
-
-
Mc Dougall, E.M.1
Clayman, R.V.2
Elashry, O.M.3
-
7
-
-
0029892669
-
Retroperitoneoscopy: A laparoscopic approach for adrenal and renal surgery
-
Gasman D, Saint F, Barthelemy Y, Antiphon P, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Retroperitoneoscopy: a laparoscopic approach for adrenal and renal surgery. Urology 1996;47:801-4.
-
(1996)
Urology
, vol.47
, pp. 801-804
-
-
Gasman, D.1
Saint, F.2
Barthelemy, Y.3
Antiphon, P.4
Chopin, D.5
Abbou, C.C.6
-
8
-
-
0031777094
-
A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy versus the open approach
-
Rasweiler J, Frede H, Henkel TO, et al. A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy versus the open approach. Eur Urol 1998;33:489-96.
-
(1998)
Eur. Urol.
, vol.33
, pp. 489-496
-
-
Rasweiler, J.1
Frede, H.2
Henkel, T.O.3
-
9
-
-
0038467304
-
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients
-
Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 2003;170:64-8.
-
(2003)
J. Urol.
, vol.170
, pp. 64-68
-
-
Gill, I.S.1
Matin, S.F.2
Desai, M.M.3
-
10
-
-
0033822289
-
Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-years experience
-
Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-years experience. J Urol 2000;164: 1153-9.
-
(2000)
J. Urol.
, vol.164
, pp. 1153-1159
-
-
Dunn, M.D.1
Portis, A.J.2
Shalhav, A.L.3
-
11
-
-
0034996383
-
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management options for the distal ureter
-
Kaouk JH, Savage SJ, Gill IS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and management options for the distal ureter. J Endourol 2001;15:385-90.
-
(2001)
J. Endourol.
, vol.15
, pp. 385-390
-
-
Kaouk, J.H.1
Savage, S.J.2
Gill, I.S.3
-
12
-
-
0034078321
-
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: The Cleveland Clinic experience
-
Gill IS, Schweizer D, Hobart MG, Sung GT, Klein EA, Novick AC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Urol 2000;163:1665-70.
-
(2000)
J. Urol.
, vol.163
, pp. 1665-1670
-
-
Gill, I.S.1
Schweizer, D.2
Hobart, M.G.3
Sung, G.T.4
Klein, E.A.5
Novick, A.C.6
-
13
-
-
0035312226
-
Should laparoscopic nephrectomy be the standard approach used for radical nephrectomy
-
Portis AJ, Clayman RV. Should laparoscopic nephrectomy be the standard approach used for radical nephrectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2001;2:165-70.
-
(2001)
Curr. Urol. Rep.
, vol.2
, pp. 165-170
-
-
Portis, A.J.1
Clayman, R.V.2
-
14
-
-
0034986313
-
Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: Experience with 350 procedures at a single center
-
Soulie M, Seguin P, Richeux L, et al. Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: experience with 350 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2001;165:1960-3.
-
(2001)
J. Urol.
, vol.165
, pp. 1960-1963
-
-
Soulie, M.1
Seguin, P.2
Richeux, L.3
-
15
-
-
0036783946
-
Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: The Indianapolis experience
-
Siquera TM, Kuo RL, Gardner TA, et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002;168:1361-5.
-
(2002)
J. Urol.
, vol.168
, pp. 1361-1365
-
-
Siquera, T.M.1
Kuo, R.L.2
Gardner, T.A.3
-
16
-
-
1642401350
-
Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: The Mayo Clinic experience
-
Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Urol 2004;171: 1447-50.
-
(2004)
J. Urol.
, vol.171
, pp. 1447-1450
-
-
Simon, S.D.1
Castle, E.P.2
Ferrigni, R.G.3
-
17
-
-
0035476297
-
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: A single center experience from the United States
-
Gill JS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States. Cancer 2001;92:1843-55.
-
(2001)
Cancer
, vol.92
, pp. 1843-1855
-
-
Gill, J.S.1
Meraney, A.M.2
Schweizer, D.K.3
-
18
-
-
0036160559
-
Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
-
Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J, et al. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1257-62.
-
(2002)
J. Urol.
, vol.167
, pp. 1257-1262
-
-
Portis, A.J.1
Yan, Y.2
Landman, J.3
|