Temporal properties in masking biological motion

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 435-443

  Hiris, Eric ^a   Humphrey, Devon ^a   Stout, Alexandra ^a  

^a ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144457132     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193322     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AHLSTROM, V., BLAKE, R., & AHLSTROM, U. (1997). Perception of biological motion. Perception, 26, 1539-1548.
2. BARCLAY, C. D., CUTTING, J. E., & KOZLOWSKI, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 145-152.
3. BEARDSWORTH, T., & BUCKNER, T. (1981). The ability to recognize one-self from a video recording of one's movements without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 19-22.
4. BEINTEMA, J. A., & LAPPE, M. (2002). Perception of biological motion without local image motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 5661-5663.
5. BERTENTHAL, B. I., & PINTO, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
6. BLAKE, R. (1993). Cats perceive biological motion. Psychological Science, 4, 54-57.
7. BLAKE, R., TURNER, L. M., SMOSKI, M. J., POZDOL, S. L., & STONE, W. L. (2003). Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological Science, 14, 151-157.
8. BONDA, E., PETRIDES, M., OSTRY, D., & EVANS, A. (1996). Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 3737-3744.
9. BROWNLOW, S., DIXON, A. R., EGBERT, C. A., & RADCLIFFE, R. D. (1997). Perception of movement and dancer characteristics from point-light displays of dance. Psychological Record, 47, 411-421.
10. CASILE, A., & GIESE, M. (2003). Roles of motion and form in biological motion recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2714, 854-862.
11. CUTTING, J. E. (1978). A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10, 91-94.
12. CUTTING, J. E. (1981). Coding theory applied to gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 71-87.
13. CUTTING, J. E., & KOZLOWSKI, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353-356.
14. CUTTING, J. E., MOORE, C., & MORRISON, R. (1988). Masking the motions of human gait. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 339-347.
15. DITTRICH, W. H. (1993). Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception, 22, 15-22.
16. DITTRICH, W. H., TROSCIANKO, T., LEA, S. E. G., & MORGAN, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727-738.
17. DOWNING, P. E., YUHONG, J., SHUMAN, M., & KANWISHER, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473.
18. FAHLE, M. (1993). Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 254, 199-203.
19. GIESE, M. A., & POGGIO, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 179-192.
20. GREZES, J., FONLUPT, P., BERTENTHAL, B., DELON-MARTIN, C., SEGEBARTH, C., & DECETY, J. (2001). Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neurolmage, 13, 775-785.
21. GROSSMAN, E. D., & BLAKE, R. (1999). Perception of coherent motion, biological motion and form-from-motion under dim-light conditions. Vision Research, 39, 3721-3727.
22. GROSSMAN, E. D., & BLAKE, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41, 1475-1482.
23. GROSSMAN, E. D., & BLAKE, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35, 1167-1175.
24. GROSSMAN, E. [D.], DONNELLY, M., PRICE, R., PICKENS, D., MORGAN, V., NEIGHBOR, G., & BLAKE, R. (2000). Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 711-720.
25. HILL, H., & POLLICK, F. E. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223-228.
26. JOHANSSON, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
27. JOHANSSON, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration on visual motion perception. Psychological Research, 38, 379-393.
28. JOKISCH, D., & TROJE, N. F. (2003). Biological motion as a cue for the perception of size. Journal of Vision, 3, 252-264.
29. KOZLOWSKI, L. T., & CUTTING, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
30. KOZLOWSKI, L. T., & CUTTING, J. E. (1978). Recognizing the gender of walkers from point-lights mounted on ankles: Some second thoughts. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 459.
31. LEE, S., & BLAKE, R. (1999). Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science, 284, 1165-1168.
32. LEONARDS, U., SINGER, W., & FAHLE, M. (1996). The influence of tem poral phase differences on texture segmentation. Vision Research, 36, 2689-2697.
33. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. MATHER, G., & MURDOCH, L. (1994). Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 258, 273-279.
35. MCLEOD, P., DITTRICH, W., DRIVER, J., PERRET, D., & ZIHL, J. (1996). Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a "motion-blind" patient. Visual Cognition, 3, 363-391.
36. MITKIN, A. A., & PAVLOVA, M. A. (1990). Changing a natural orientation: Recognition of biological motion pattern by children and adults. Psychologische Beiträge, 32, 28-35.
37. PAVLOVA, M., & SOKOLOV, A. (2000). Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 889-899.
38. POIZNER, H., BELLUGI, U., & LUTES-DRISCOL, V. (1981). Perception of American sign language in dynamic point-light displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 430-440.
39. POLLICK, F. E., LESTOU, V., RYU, J., & CHO, S. (2002). Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Research, 42, 2345-2355.
40. POLLICK, F. E., PATERSON, H. M., BRUDERLIN, A., & SANFORD, A. J. (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition, 82, B51-B61.
41. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 733-740.
42. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1983). Kinematic specifications of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender-recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
43. SERVOS, P., OSU, R., SANTI, A., & KAWATO, M. (2002). The neural substrates of biological motion perception: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 772-782.
44. SHIFFRAR, M., LICHTEY, L., & CHATTERJEE, S. H. (1997). The perception of biological motion across apertures. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 51-59.
45. SHIPLEY, T. F. (2003). The effect of object and event orientation on perception of biological motion. Psychological Science, 14, 377-380.
46. STEVENAGE, S. V., NIXON, M. S., & VINCE, K. (1999). Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 513-526.
47. SUMI, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283-286.
48. TADIN, D., LAPPIN, J. S., BLAKE, R., & GROSSMAN, E. D. (2002). What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1010-1015.
49. THORNTON, I. M., RENSINK, R. A., & SHIFFRAR, M. (2002). Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception, 31, 837-853.
50. TROJE, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2, 371-387.
51. TROJE, N. F. (2003). Reference frames for orientation anisotropies in face recognition and biological-motion perception. Perception, 32, 201-210.
52. VAINA, L. M., LEMAY, M., BIENFANG, D. C., CHOI, A. Y., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1990). Intact "biological motion" and "structure from motion" perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study. Visual Neuroscience, 5, 353-369.
53. WALK, R. D., & HOMAN, C. P. (1984). Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 437-440.