Ethics and aesthetics are - ?

Art and Morality

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 19-36

  Tanner, Michael ^a  

^a University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144454782     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203454763-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Notebooks 1914-16, ed. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, English trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1961), p. 83e.
2. Stuart Hampshire, ‘Logic and appreciation’, in W. Elton ed., Aesthetics and Language (Oxford: Blackwell, 1954), p. 166.
3. Marie von Bülow, Hans von Bülows Leben, dargestellt aus seinen Briefen, Zweite Auflage (Leipzig, 1921), pp. 220-2.
4. Monroe C. Beardsley, The Possibility of Criticism (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1970).
5. Richard Wollheim, Art and its Objects, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 233.
6. W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley, ‘The intentional fallacy’, in David Newton-de Molina ed., On Literary Intention (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1976).
7. P. F. Strawson, Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays (London: Methuen, 1974).
8. Arnold Isenberg, ‘Critical communication’, in Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism:Selected Essays of Arnold Isenberg, ed. William Callaghan et al. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1973), p. 164.
9. John Casey, ‘The autonomy of art’, in Godfrey Vesey ed., Philosophy and the Arts (London:Macmillan, 1973).
10. Aldous Huxley, On Art and Artists, ed. Morris Philipson (London: Chatto and Windus, 1960), p. 53.
11. Robert Craft, Chronicle of a Friendship (New York/London: Knopf/Gollancz, 1972).