Allergic contact dermatitis in patients with atopic dermatitis: A clinical study

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 96-98

  Sharma, A D ^a  

^a NONE   (India)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Atopic dermatitis; Patch test

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; ANTIALLERGIC AGENT; CLIOQUINOL; GENTAMICIN; NEOMYCIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATCH TEST; REMISSION; SAMPLE SIZE; SCHOOL CHILD; SKIN ALLERGY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 22144448551     PISSN: 03786323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.13992     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rajka G. Essential Aspects of Atopic Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1989.
2. Rogge JL, Hanifin JM. Immunodeficiencies in severe atopic dermatitis. Depressed chemotaxis and lymphocyte transformation. Arch Dermatol 1976;112:1391-9.
3. Uehara M, Sawai T. A longitudinal study of contact sensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:366-8.
4. Klas PA, Corey G, Storrs FJ, Chan SC, Hanifin JM. Allergic and irritant patch test reactions and atopic disease. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:121-4.
5. Hanifin J, Chan S. Diagnoses and treatment of atopic dermatitis. Dermatological Therapy 1996;1:9-18.
6. Uehara M, Omoto M, Sugiura H. Diagnoses and management of the red face syndrome. Dermatological Therapy 1996;1:19-23.
7. Lazarov A, Cordoba M, Plosok N, Abraham D. Atypical and Unusual Clinical Manifestations of Contact Dermatitis to Clothing (Textile Contact Dermatitis). Case Presentation and Review of the Literature. Dermatol Online J 9(3). Posted on 09-17-2003; www.medscape.com/viewarticle/461118. Page accessed:8/31/2004.
8. Schopf E, Baumgartner A. Patch testing in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:860-2.
9. Sharma AD. A Clinical Study of Atopic Dermatitis. Thesis submitted to Gauhati University, 2001.
10. Goh CL. Contact sensitivity in Singapore. Hifu (Skin Research) 1986;28:41-51.
11. Nethercott JR. Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada. Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:389-95.
12. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America. Arch Dermatol 1973;108:537-40.
13. Pasricha JS, Bharati G. Contact hypersensitivity due to local antibacterial agents. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1981;47:27-30.
14. Kaur S, Sharma VK. Indigenous patch test unit resembling Finn chamber. Indian J Dermatol Venerol Leprol 1986;52:332-6.
15. Singh KK, Singh G, Chandra S, Mukhija. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Antibacrerial Agents. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1991;57:86-8.
16. Millard TP, Orton DI. Changing Pattern of contact allergy in chronic inflammatory ear disease. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:83-6.
17. Rudzki E, Zakrazewski Z, Rebandel P, Crzywa Z, Hudymowicz W. Cross reaction between amynoglycoside antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:314-6.
18. Fraki JE, Peltonen L, Hopsu-Havu VK. Allergy to various components of topical preparations in stasis dermatitis and leg ulcer. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5:97-100.
19. Burry TN, Kirk J, Reid JG, Turner T, Chlorocresol sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:41-2.
20. Nilsson EJ, Henning CG, Magnussan J. Topical Corticosteroids and Staphylococcus aureous in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;27:29-34.