The work of rehabilitation

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 643-648

  Dixon, Graeme S ^a   Caradoc Davies, T H ^b  

^a ISIS Rehabilitation Centre   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

FIM; Neurological rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION CENTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM;

BRAIN DISEASES; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REHABILITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 22144448548     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280400018429     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wade DT. Community Rehabilitation. Clin Rehab 2001:575.
2. Accident Compensation Corporation. Your guide to ACC (ACC 588) Retrieved 25/04/2005 http://www.acc.co.nz/acc-publications/dfs/acc-guide.pdf.
3. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM(TM) instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY 14214-3007: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.
4. Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Goin JE, et al. A case mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care 1994;32:366-379
5. Voll R, Krumm B, Schweisthal B. Functional independence measure (FIM) assessing outcome in medical rehabilitation of neurologically ill adolescents. Int J Rehab Res 200 1;24:123-131.
6. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fielder R, Granger CV. The Functional Independence Measure: Tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1996;77:1101-1108.
7. Turner-Stokes L. Standardized outcome assessment in brain injury rehabilitation for younger adults. Dis Rehab 2000;24(7):383-389.
8. Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1994;73(1):51-55.
9. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
10. Hobart J, Freeman J, Thompson A. Kurtzke scales revisited: The application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition. Brain 2000;123(5):1027-1040.
11. Sharrak B, Hughes R, Soudain S, Dunn G. The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1999;122:141-159.
12. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
13. Willmes K, Deloche G. Methodological issues in neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehab 1997;7:273-277.
14. Robertson IH. Editorial: Methodology in neuropsychological rehabilitation research. Neuropsychol Rehab 1994;4:1-6.
15. Park NW, Ingles JL. Effectiveness of attention rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropsycholog 2000;15(2):199-210.
16. Hochstenbach JB, den Otter R, Mulder TW. Cognitive recovery after stroke: A 2-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2003;84(10):1499-1504.
17. Hinkle JL. The use of the FIM instrument in the poststroke population. Top Stroke Rehab 2000;7(3):47-66.
18. Watson AH, Kanny EM, White DM, Anson DK. ADL rating scales in spinal injury and disease services. Am J Occup Ther 1995;49:229-234.
19. National Association of Neurological Occupational Therapists. ADL and outcome measures. NANOT News Lett 1997;3:2-3.
20. Turner-Stokes L. The effectiveness of rehabilitation: Introduction. Clin Rehab 1999;13(1):3-7.
21. Caradoc-Davies TH, Campbell J, Dixon GS. Benefit from admission to a geriatric assessment and rehabilitation unit. J Am Geriat Soc 1989;37(1):25-28.