Advected scalar version of the differences between the true dissipation and its one-dimensional surrogate in isotropic turbulence

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1830-1833

  Hosokawa, Iwao ^a,c   Oide, Shin Ichi ^a   Yamamoto, Kiyoshi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

^b National Aerospace Laboratory

^c NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Advected scalar increment; Direct numerical simulation; Dissipation surrogate; Isotropic turbulence; Joint multifractal; Similarity variable

Indexed keywords

EID: 22044458132     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.67.1830     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. R. H. Kraichnan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1991) 1016.
2. A. N. Kolmogorov: J. Fluid Mech. 13 (1962) 82.
3. A. M. Obukhov: Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR 13 (1949) 58.
4. S. Corrsin: J. Appl. Phys. 22 (1951) 469.
5. I. Hosokawa and K. Yamamoto: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59 (1990) 401;
6. Phys. Fluids A 2 (1990) 889;
7. Turbulence and Coherent Structures, ed. O. Metais and M. Lesieur (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991) p. 177.
8. I. Hosokawa, S. Oide and K. Yamamoto: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 4548.
9. I. Hosokawa, S. Oide and K. Yamamoto: Nagare 16 (1997) 259;
10. Nagare 17 (1998) 28.
11. Y. Zhu, R. A. Antonia and I. Hosokawa: Phys. Fluids 7 (1995) 1637.
12. 23)
13. I. Hosokawa: Fluid Dyn. Res. 15 (1995) 337.
14. I. Hosokawa: Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995) 781.
15. I. Hosokawa: Phys. Rev. E 49 (1991) 4775.
16. I. Hosokawa: Phys. Rev. A 43 (1991) 6735.
17. A. M. Yaglom: Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys. 17 (1981) 919.
18. R. A. Antonia, A. J. Chambers and L. W. B. Browne: Exp. Fluids 1 (1983) 213.
19. A. M. Yaglom: Dok. Akad. Nauk SSSR 69 (1949) 743.
20. C. Meneveau, K. R. Sreenivasan, P. Kailasnath and M. S. Fan: Phys. Rev. A 41 (1990) 891.
21. C. Meneveau and K. R. Sreenivasan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1424.
22. It is possible to make the same kind of comparison using our numerical data. However we avoided the need for a very large computer time for that, because we verified that our 1D f(α) and f(β) for the single ε and χ measure, respectively, are in fair agreement with the experimental ones seen in ref. 17 so that it may well be judged that the experimental results would generally assume the corresponding results by the 1D treatment of our numerical data.
23. λ. In other words, scale-similarity is not necessarily confined to the inertial range of scale.
24. G. R. Ruetsch and M. R. Maxey: Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 2747.
25. Z.-S. She, E. Jackson and S. A. Orszag: Nature 344 (1990) 226.
26. G. Stolovitzky and K. R. Sreenivasan: Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 (1994) 229.
27. I. Hosokawa: Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 453 (1997) 691.