The role of dispersal and demography in determining the efficacy of marine reserves

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 863-871

  Gerber, Leah R ^a   Heppell, Selina S ^b   Ballantyne, Ford ^c   Sala, Enric ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; DISPERSAL; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY REGULATION; POPULATION MODELING; PROTECTED AREA;

EID: 22044444148     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/f05-046     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Acosta, C.A. 2002. Spatially explicit dispersal dynamics and equilibrium population sizes in marine harvest refuges. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59: 458-468.
2. Agardy, M.T. 1994. Advances in marine conservation: the role of marine protected areas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 267-270.
3. Allison, G.W., Lubchenco, J., and Carr, M.H. 1998. Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecol. Appl. 8: S79-S92.
4. Botsford, L., Hastings, A., and Gaines, S. 2001. Dependence of sustainability on the configuration of marine reserves and larval dispersal distance. Ecol. Lett. 4: 144-150.
5. Botsford, L.W., Micheli, F., and Hastings, A. 2003. Principles for the design of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13: S25-S31.
6. Bullock, L.H., Murphy, M.D., Godcharles, M.F., and Mitchell, M. 1992. Age, growth, and reproduction of Jewfish Epinephelus itajara in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Bull. 90: 243-249
7. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
8. Crowder, L.B., Crouse, D.T., Heppell, S.S., and Martin, T.H. 1994. Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations. Ecol. Appl. 4: 437-445.
9. Doak, D.F. 1995. Source-sink models and the problem of habitat degradation: general models and applications to the Yellowstone grizzly. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1370-1979.
10. Fujiwara, M., and Caswell, H. 2001. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature (Lond.), 414(6863): 537-541.
11. Gaines, S., Gaylord, B., and Largier, J.L. 2003. Avoiding current oversights in marine reserve design. Ecol. Appl. 13: S32-S46.
12. Gell, F.R., and Roberts, C.M. 2003. Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 448-455.
13. Gerber, L.R., and Heppell, S.S. 2004. The use of demographic sensitivity analysis in marine species conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 120: 121-128.
14. Gerber, L.R., Kareiva, P.M., and Bascompte, J. 2002. The interplay of life history attributes and fishing pressure in evaluating efficacy of marine reserves. Biol. Conserv. 106: 11-18.
15. Gerber, L.R., Botsford, L.W., Hastings, A., Possingham, H.P., Gaines, S.D., Palumbi, S.R., and Andelman, S.J. 2003. Population models for reserve design: a retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 13: S47-64.
16. Grantham, B.A., Eckert, G.L., and Shanks, A.L. 2003. Dispersal potential of marine invertebrates in diverse habitats. Ecol. Appl. 13: S108-S116.
17. Heppell, S.S., Crowder, L.B., and Menzel, T.R. 1999. Life table analysis of long-lived marine species with implications for conservation and management. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 32: 137-148.
18. Heppell, S.S., Caswell, H., and Crowder, L.B. 2000. Life histories and elasticity patterns: perturbation analysis for species with minimal demographic data. Ecology, 81: 654-665.
19. Hooker, S., and Gerber, L.R. 2004. Potential importance of megafauna: marine reserves as a tool for ecosystem-based management? BioScience, 54: 29-41.
20. Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., and McClure, M. 2001. Recovery and management options for spring/summer chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Science (Wash., D.C.), 290: 977-979.
21. Lockwood, D.R., Hastings, A., and Botsford, L.W. 2002. The effects of dispersal patterns on marine reserves: does the tail wag the dog? Theor. Popul. Biol. 61: 297-309.
22. Martell, S.J.D., Walters, C.J., and Wallace, S.S. 2000. The use of marine protected areas for conservation of lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus). Bull. Mar. Sci. 3: 729-743.
23. Morris, W.F., and Doak, D.F. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
24. National Research Council. 2001. Marine protected areas: tools for sustaining ocean ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
25. Pfister, C.A., and Bradbury, A. 1996. Harvesting red sea urchins: recent effects and future predictions. Ecol. Appl. 6: 298-310.
26. Polacheck, T. 1990. Year round closed areas as a management tool. Nat. Resour. Model. 4: 327-354.
27. Quinn, J.F., Wing, S.R., and Botsford, L.W. 1993. Harvest refugia in marine invertebrate fisheries: models and applications to the red sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. Am. Zool. 33: 537-550.
28. Reilly, S. 1984. Observed and maximum rates of increase in gray whales, Eschrichtius robustus. Rep. Int. Whaling Comm. Spec. Issue, 6: 389-400.
29. Sadovy, Y., and Eklund, A.E. 1999. Synopsis of biological data on the Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus (Bloch, 1792), and the jewfish, E. itajara (Lichtenstein, 1822). NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 146.
30. Sala, E., Aburto, O., Paredes, G., Parra, I., Barrera, J.C., and Dayton, P.K. 2002. A general model for designing networks of marine reserves. Science (Wash., D.C.), 298: 1991-1993.
31. Sala, E., Aburto, O., Paredes, G., and Thompson, G. 2003. Spawning aggregations and reproductive behavior of reef fishes in the Gulf of California. Bull. Mar. Sci. 72: 103-121.
32. Stockhausen, W.T., Lipcius, R.N., and Hickey, B.M. 2000. Joint effects of larval dispersal, population regulation, marine reserve design, and exploitation on production and recruitment in the Caribbean spiny lobster. Bull. Mar. Sci. 3: 957-990.
33. Wooton, J.T., and Bell, D.A. 1992. A metapopulation model of the peregrine falcon in California: viability and management strategies. Ecol. Appl. 2: 307-321.