Sexual-selection models for exaggerated traits are useful but constraining

American Zoologist

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 59-69

  Barlow, George W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22044441092     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/38.1.59     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Is there a unifying concept of sexual selection that applies to both plants and animals? Amer. Nat. 144:51-SI2.
3. Baerends, G. P. and J. M. Baerends-van Roon. 1950. An introduction to the study of the ethology of cichlid fishes. Behaviour Suppl. 1:1-242.
4. Baerends, G. P. and J. P. Kruijt. 1973. Stimulus selection. In R. A. Hinde and J. Stevenson-Hinde (eds.). Constraints on learning, pp. 23-50. Academic Press, London.
5. Barlow, G. W. 1974. Contrasts in social behavior between Central American cichlid fishes and coralreef surgeon fishes. Amer. Zool. 14:9-34.
6. Barlow, G. W. 1976. The Midas cichlid in Nicaragua. In T. B. Thorson (ed.), Investigations of the iclitliyofauna of Nicaraguan lakes, pp. 333-358. School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
7. Barlow, G. W. 1983. Do gold Midas cichlid fish win fights because of their color, or because they lack normal coloration? A logistic solution. Beh. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13:197-204.
8. Barlow, G. W. 1991. Mating systems among cichlid fishes. In M. H. A. Keenleyside (ed.), Cichlid fishes, behaviour, ecology and evolution, pp. 173190. Chapman and Hall, New York.
9. Barlow, G. W. 1992. Is mating different in monogamous species? The Midas cichlid fish as a case study. Amer. Zool. 32:91-99.
10. Barlow, G. W. and R. C. Francis. 1988. Unmasking affiliative behavior among juvenile Midas cichlids (Cichlasoma citrinellum). J. Comp. Psychol. 102: 118-123.
11. Barlow, G. W., R. C. Francis, and J. V. Baumgartner.
12. 1990. Do the colours of parents, companions and self influence assortative mating in the polychromatic Midas cichlid? Anim. Behav. 40:713-722.
13. Barlow, G. W. and J. W. Munsey. 1976. The red devilMidas-arrow cichlid species complex in Nicaragua. In T. B. Thorson (ed.). Investigations of the ichthyofmma of Nicaraguan lakes, pp. 359-369. School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
14. Barlow, G. W. and W. Rogers. 1978. Female Midas cichlid's choice of mate in relation to parents' and to own color. Biol. Behav. 3:137-146.
15. Barlow, G. W., W. Rogers, and R. V. Cappeto. 1977. Incompatibility and assortative mating in the Midas cichlid. Beh. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2:49-59.
16. Barlow, G. W, W. Rogers, and N. Fraley. 1986. Do Midas cichlids win through prowess or daring? It depends. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:1-8.
17. Barlow, G. W. and P. Siri. 1994. Polychromatic Midas cichlids respond to dummy opponents: Color, contrast and context. Behaviour 130:77-112.
18. Barlow, G. W. and P. Siri. 1997. Does sexual selection account for the conspicuous head dimorphism in the Midas cichlid? Anim. Behav. 52:573-584.
19. Barlow, G. W. and S. J. Wallach. 1976. Colour and levels of aggression in the Midas cichlid. Anim. Behav. 24:814-817.
20. Basolo, A. L. and J. A. Endler. 1995. Sensory biases and the evolution of sensory systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:489.
21. Berghe, E. van den. Appalachian Environmental Laboratory, Gunter Hall, Frostburg, Maryland 21532.
22. Bleick, C. R. 1975. Hormonal control of the nuchal hump in the cichlid fish Cichlasoma citrinellum. Gen. Comp. Endocrin. 26:198-208.
23. Burley, N. 1977. Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74: 3476-3479.
24. Burley, N. 1981. Mate choice by multiple criteria in a monogamous species. Amer. Natur. 117:5IS528.
25. Burley, N. 1985. The organization of behavior and the evolution of sexually selected traits. Amer. Ornithol. Union, Ornithol. Monogr. 37:22-44.
26. Clark, D. L. and G. W. Uetz. 1990. Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim. Behav. 40:884-890.
27. Coleman, R. M. 1993. The evolution of parental investment in fishes. Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto.
28. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
29. Dickman, M. C., C. Annett, and G. W. Barlow. 1990. Unsuspected cryptic polymorphism in the polychromatic Midas cichlid. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39: 239-249.
30. Dickman, M. C., M. Schliwa, and G. W. Barlow. 1988. Melanophore death and disappearance produces color metamorphosis in the polychromatic Midas cichlid (Cichlasoma citrinellum). Cell Tiss. Res. 253:9-14.
31. Dominey, W. J. 1984. Effects of sexual selection and life history on speciation: Species flocks in African cichlids and Hawaiian Drosophila. In A. A.
32. Echelle and I. Kornfield (eds.). Evolution offish species flocks, pp. 231-249. University of Maine at Orono Press, Orono.
33. Evans, M. R. and K. Morris. 1996. The importance of carotenoids in signaling during aggressive interactions between male firemouth cichlids (Cichlasoma meeki). Behav. Ecol. 7:1-6.
34. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover, New York.
35. Francis, R. C. and G. W. Barlow. 1993. Social control of primary sex differentiation in the Midas cichlid. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:10673-10675.
36. Greenberg, B. 1963. Parental behavior and imprinting in cichlid fishes. Behaviour 21:127-144.
37. Greenwood, P. H. 1991. Speciation. / M. H. A. Keenleyside (ed.), Cichlid fishes. Behaviour, ecology and evolution, pp. 86-102. Chapman and Hall, New York.
38. Hamilton, W. D. and M. Zuk. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218:384-387.
39. Hoelzer, G. A. 1989. The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 38:1067-1078.
40. Keenleyside, M. H. A. 1985. Bigamy and mate choice in the biparental cichlid fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatwn. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17:285-290.
41. Kodric-Brown, A. and J. H. Brown. 1984. Truth in advertising: The kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Amer. Nat. 124:309-323.
42. Kosswig, G. 1947. Selective mating as a factor for speciation in cichlid fish of East African lakes. Nature 179:604-605.
43. Liem, K. F. 1973. Evolutionary strategies and morphological innovations: Cichlid pharyngeal jaws. Systemat. Zool. 22:425-441.
44. Macedonia, J. M. and J. A. Stamps. 1994. Species recognition in Anolis grahami (Sauria, Iguanidae): Evidence from responses to video playbacks to conspecific and heterospecific displays. Ethology 98:246-264.
45. Marier, P. and D. Isaac. 1960. Song variation in a population of brown towhees. Condor 62:272283.
46. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Amer. Natur. 100:637-650.
47. Mayr, E. 1984. Evolution of fish species flocks: A commentary. In A. A. Echelle and I. Kornfield (eds.), Evolution offish species flocks, pp. 3-11. University of Maine Press, Orono.
48. McKaye, K. R. 1977. Competition for breeding sites between the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloâ, Nicaragua. Ecology 58:293-302.
49. McKaye, K. R. 1980. Seasonality in habitat selection by the gold color morph of Cichlasoma citrinellum and its relevance to sympatric speciation in the family Cichlidae. Env. Biol. Fish. 5:75-78.
50. McKaye, K. R. 1986. Mate choice and size assortative pairing by the cichlid fishes of Lake Jilod, Nicaragua. J. Fish. Biol. 29:135-150.
51. McKaye, K. R. 1991. Sexual selection and the evolution of the cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, Africa. In M. H. A. Keenleyside (ed.), Cichlid fishes. Behaviour, ecology and evolution, pp. 241-257. Chapman & Hall, New York.
52. McKaye, K. R. and G. W. Barlow. 1976. Competition between color morphs of the Midas cichlid, C/c/ilasoma citrinellum, in Lake Jilod, Nicaragua. In T. B. Thorson (ed.), Investigations of the ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan lakes, pp. 465-475. School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
53. McKaye, K. R. and J. R. Stauffer. 1986. Description of a gold cichlid (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from Lake Malawi, Africa. Copeia 1986:870-875.
54. Meek, S. E. 1904. The fresh-water fishes of Mexico north of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Field Columbian Mus. Publ. 93, Zool. Sen 5:1-252.
55. Meyer, A. 1990. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of the trophic polymorphism in Cichlasoma citrinellum (Pisces: Cichlidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39:279-299.
56. Noakes, D. L. G. and G. W. Barlow. 1973. Crossfostering and parent-offspring responses in Cichlasoma citrinellum. Z. Tierpsychol. 33:147-152.
57. Noonan, K. C. 1983. Female mate choice in the cichlid fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Anim. Behav. 3l':1005-1010.
58. Rogers, W. and G. W. Barlow. 1991. Sex differences in mate choice in a monogamous biparental fish, the Midas cichlid (Cichlasoma citrinellum). Ethology 87:249-261.
59. Ryan, M. J. 1990. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:157-195.
60. Ryan, M. J. and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
61. Searcy, W. A. 1982. The evolutionary effects of mate selection. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13:57-85.
62. Seehausen, O. 1996. Distribution of and reproductive isolation among color morphs of a rock-dwelling Lake Victoria cichlid (Haplochromis nyererei). Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 5:195-202.
63. Siepen, G. and M.-D. Crapon de Caprona. 1986. The influence of parental color morph on mate choice in the cichlid fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Ethology 71:187-200.
64. Spurway, H. and J. B. S. Haldane. 1953. The comparative ethology of vertebrate breathing. Behaviour 6:8-34.
65. Stauffer, J. R., Jr., N. J. Bowers, K. R. McKaye, and T. D. Kocher. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units among cichlid fishes: The role of behavioral studies. Amer. Fisher. Soc. Symp. 17:227-244.
66. Tinbergen, N. 1951. The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
67. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (ed.). Sexual selection and the descent of man, pp. 136-179. Aldine, Chicago.
68. Weatherhead, P. J. 1990. Secondary sexual traits, parasites, and polygyny in red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Behav. Ecol. 1:125-130.
69. Weber, P. G. 1976. The effect of female color, size, dominance and early experience upon mate selection in male convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum Günther (Pisces, Cichlidae). Behaviour 56:116-135.
70. Wiley, R. H. and J. Poston. 1996. Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371-1381.
71. Willson, M. F. 1990. Sexual selection in plants and animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:210-214.
72. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53:205-214.