Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease

Neurology

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-32

  Wright, V L ^a   Olan, W ^b   Dick, B ^b   Yu, H ^a   Alberts Grill, N ^a   Latour, L L ^a   Baird, Alison E ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^b SUBURBAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FILM; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEURORADIOLOGY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPRAAORTIC VASCULAR DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; CAROTID ARTERY, EXTERNAL; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 22044436155     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000167606.81882.68     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pasternak RC, Criqui MH, Benjamin EJ, et al. AHA Conference Proceedings. Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. Writing Group 1: Epidemiology. Circulation 2004;109:2605-2612.
2. Fine-Edelstein JS, Wolf PA, O'Leary DH, et al. Precursors of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis in the Framingham Study. Neurology 2004;44:1046-1050.
3. Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Weber M, Gefeller O, Neundoerfer B, Heuschmann PU. Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria. Incidence, recurrence and long-term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study. Stroke 2001;32:2735-2740.
4. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453.
5. Leclerc X, Pruvo J-P. Recent advances in magnetic resonance angiography of carotid and vertebral arteries. Curr Opin Neurol 2000;13:75-82.
6. Baird AK, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:583-609.
7. Nonent M, Serfaty J-M, Nighogossian N, et al. Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice. Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study. Stroke 2004;35:682-686.
8. Prince MR. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: theory and optimization. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:257-267.
9. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 2001;357:1086-1091.
10. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881.
11. Nelson KL, Gifford LM, Lauber-Huber C, Gross CA, Lasser TA. Clinical safety of gadopentate dimeglumine. Radiology 1995;196:439-443.
12. Niendorf HP, Dinger JC, Haustein J, Cornelius I, Alhassan A, Clauss W. Tolerance data of Gd-DTPA: a review. Eur J Radiol 1991;13:15-20.
13. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415-1425.
14. Gorelick PB. Carotid endarterectomy. Where do we draw the line? Stroke 1999;30:1745-1750.
15. Chiowanich P, Mitchell DG, Ortega HV, Mohamed F. Arterial pseudostenosis on first-pass gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional angiography: new observation of a potential pitfall. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:523-527.
16. Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al. High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective x-ray angiography. Stroke 2002;33:1522-1529.
17. U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Graves MJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease. Diagnostic and potential clinical impact. Neurology 2004;62:1282-1290.
18. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac flow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996;198:725-732.
19. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-362.
20. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, Lovblad KO, Schroth G. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213-219.
21. Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-León J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1012-1019.
22. Feasby TE, Findlay JM. CT angiography for the assessment of carotid stenosis. Neurology 2004;63:412-413.
23. Caplan LR. Treatment of acute stroke. Still struggling. JAMA 2004;292:1883-1885.
24. Amarenco P, Duyckaerts C, Tzourio C, Henin D, Bousser M-G, Hauw J. The prevalence of ulcerated plaques in the aortic arch of patients with stroke. N Engl J Med 1992;326:221-225.
25. Summers RM, Andrasko-Bourgeois J, Feuerstein IM, et al. Evaluation of the aortic root by MRI: insights from patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 1998;98:509-518.