Regularization model of human binocular vision

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5674, Issue , 2005, Pages 229-240

  Pizlo, Zygmunt ^a   Li, Yunfeng ^a   Chan, Moses W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Inverse problems; Regularization models; Shape perception

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR PERCEPTION; REGULARIZATION MODELS; SHAPE PERCEPTION; VISUAL NOISE;

CONSTRAINT THEORY; FEATURE EXTRACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

BINOCULAR VISION;

EID: 21944455953     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.598015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Julesz B. (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
2. Marr D. (1982) Vision. New York: W.H. Freeman.
3. Howard I.P. & Rogers B.J. (1995) Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Hartley R.I. & Sturm P. (1997) Triangulation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 68, 146-57.
5. Chan M.W., Pizlo Z. & Chelberg D.M. (1999) Binocular shape reconstruction: psychological plausibility of the 8 point algorithm. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 74, 121-37.
6. Grimson W.E.L. (1982) A computational theory of visual surface interpolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London) B, 298, 395-427.
7. Poggio T., Torre V. & Koch C. (1985) Computational vision and regularization theory. Nature, 317, 314-9.
8. Marill T. (1991) Emulating the human interpretation of line-drawings as 3-D objects. International Journal of Computer Vision, 6, 147-61.
9. Leclerc Y.G. & Fischler M.A. (1992) An optimization-based approach to the interpretation of single line drawings as 3-D wire frames. International Journal of Computer Vision, 9, 113-36.
10. Ullman S. (1979) The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Longuet-Higgins H.C. (1981) A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature, 293, 133-5.
12. Pizlo Z. & Stevenson A.K. (1999) Shape constancy from novel views. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1299-307.
13. Rogers B.J. & Graham M.E. (1982) Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 216-70.
14. Pizlo Z. (2001) Perception viewed as an inverse problem. A mini-review. Vision Research, 41, 3145-61.
15. Macmillan N.A. & Creelman C.D. (1991) Detection theory: a user's guide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hochberg J. & McAlister E. (1953) A quantitative approach to figural 'goodness'. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 361-4.
17. Hochberg J. & Brooks V. (1960) The psychophysics of form: reversible perspective drawings of spatial objects. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 337-55.
18. Attneave F. & Frost R. (1969) The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 391-6.
19. Perkins D.N. (1972) Visual discrimination between rectangular and nonrectangular parallelepipeds. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 396-400.
20. Perkins D.N. (1982) The perceiver as organizer and geometer. In: J.Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 73-93).
21. Mitchison G. (1988) Planarity and segmentation in stereoscopic matching. Perception, 17, 753-82.
22. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B. & Young M. (1995) Measuring and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
23. Pizlo Z., Rosenfeld A. & Epelboim J. (1995) An exponential pyramid model of the time-course of size processing. Vision Research, 35, 1089-1107.
24. Pizlo Z. & Salach-Golyska M. (1995) 3-D shape perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 692-714.
25. Pizlo Z., Rosenfeld A. & Weiss I. (1997a) The geometry of visual space: about the incompatibility between science and mathematics. Dialogue. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 65, 425-33.
26. Pizlo Z., Rosenfeld A. & Weiss I. (1997b) Visual space: mathematics, engineering, and science. Response. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 65, 450-4.
27. Chan M.W. (1999) A psychologically plausible algorithm for binocular shape reconstruction. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Purdue University.
28. Chan M.W., Stevenson A.K., Li Y. & Pizlo Z. (2005) Binocular shape constancy from novel views: the role of a priori constraints (submitted).
29. Pizlo Z., Rosenfeld A. & Weiss I. (1995) Interdisciplinary study of visual invariants. In: D.Dori, A.Bruckstein (Eds.) Shape, structure and pattern recognition. Singapore: World Scientific (pp. 118-127).