Approaches to gender and the law: Research and applications

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 129-143

  Goodman Delahunty, Jane ^a  

^a Equal Employment Opportunity Commission   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944449946     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025732923376     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arvey, R. D., & Cavanaugh, M. A. (1995). Using surveys to assess the prevalence of sexual harassment: Some methodological problems. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117-138.
2. Barnett, R. C. (1997). How paradigms shape the stories we tell: Paradigm shifts in gender and health. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 351-368.
3. Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense: 1995 sexual harassment survey. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
4. Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, this issue.
5. Brody, L. R. (1997). Gender and emotion: Beyond stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 369-393.
6. Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1997). Sexual harassment: An experimental test of sex-role spillover theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 63-75.
7. Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et seq., as amended.
8. Cochran, C. C., Frazier, P. A., & Olson, A. M. (1997). Predictors of responses to unwanted sexual attention. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 202-227.
9. Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).
10. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing men and women. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
11. Ellison v. Brady, 924 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991).
12. EEOC v. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, 885 F. Zd 575 (9th Cir. 1989).
13. EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co., 628 F.Supp. 1264 (N.D. Ill. 1986).
14. EEOC v. Walden Book Company, 885 F.Supp. 1100 (M.D.Tenn. 1995).
15. Eisenstein, Z. R. (1988). The female body and the law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1980). Final guidelines on sexual harassment in the workplace. 45 Fed. Reg. 74676. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
18. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Shullman, S. L. (1995, August). The development and validation of an objectively scored measure of sexual harassment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
19. Franke, K. M. (1995). The central mistake of sex discrimination law: The disaggregation of sex from gender. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144, 1-95.
20. Frazier, P. A., Cochran, C. C., & Olson, A. M. (1995). Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 21-38.
21. Fredette v. BVP Management Association, 905 F. Supp. 1034 (M.D. Fla. 1995).
22. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
23. Goodman, J. (1992). Jurors' comprehension and assessment of probabilistic evidence. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 16, 361-389.
24. Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1998). Civil law: Employment and discrimination. In R. Roesch, S. Hart, & J. E. Ogloff (Eds.), Perspectives on psychology and law: The state of the discipline. New York: Plenum Press.
25. Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Foote, W. (1995). Compensation for pain, suffering, and other psychological injuries: The impact of Daubert on employment discrimination claims. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 183-206.
26. Greene, E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1995). Diagnosis of psychological impairment in employment discrimination claims. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 459-476.
27. Gutek, B., & O'Connor, M. (1995). The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 151-166.
28. Gutek, B., O'Connor, M., & Melancon, R. (1997, May). Factors affecting perceptions of sexual harassment using realistic, detailed scenarios. Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Society, Washington, D.C.
29. Hahn, P. W., & Clayton, S. D. (1996). The effects of attorney presentation style, attorney gender, and juror gender on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 533-554.
30. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 114 S.Ct. 567 (1993).
31. Henderson, L. (1991). Review essay: Law's patriarchy. Law and Society Review, 25, 411-444.
32. Hoyt, S., & Scherer, D. G. (1998). Female juvenile delinquency: Misunderstood by the juvenile justice system, neglected by social science. Law and Human Behavior, this issue.
33. Hyde, J. S., & Plant, E. A. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side of the story. American Psychologist, 50, 159-161.
34. Lippel, K. (1997, June). Workers' compensation and stress: Gender and access to compensation. Paper presented at the XXII International Congress on Law and Mental Health, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
35. Lott, B. (1997). The personal and social correlates of gender difference ideology. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 279-297.
36. MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourse on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Menkel-Meadow, C., & Diamond, S. S. (1991). The content, method, and epistemology of gender in sociolegal studies. Law and Society Review, 25, 221-238.
38. Meritor Savings Bank F.E.B. v. Vinson, 106 S.Ct. 2399 (1986).
39. Pryor, J. P., & Whalen, N. (1997). A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and social circumstances under which harassment occurs. In W O. Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research and treatment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Riger, S. (1997). From snapshots to videotape: New directions in research on gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 395-408.
41. Riger, S., Foster-Fishman, P., Nelson-Kuna, J., & Curran, B. (1995). Gender bias in courtroom dynamics. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 465-480.
42. Rudman, R. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517.
43. Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., Ustad, K., & Sewell, K. W. (1998). The relationship between psychopathy and recidivism among female inmates. Law and Human Behavior, this issue.
44. Schafran, L. H. (1987). Documenting gender bias in the courts: The task force approach. Judicature, 70, 280-290.
45. Schuller, R. A., & Cripps, J. (1998). Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: The impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony. Law and Human Behavior, this issue.
46. Schulte, V. & Petterson, S. (1992). Race, gender, work, and choice: An empirical study of the lack of interest defense in Title VII cases challenging job segregation. University of Chicago Law Review, 59, 1073-1181.
47. Schwartz, D. J., & Goodman, J. (1992). Expert testimony on decision processes in employment cases. Law & Human Behavior, 16, 337-355.
48. Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge.
49. Stone-Harris, R. L. (1996). Same sex harassment - The next step in the evolutionof sexual harassment law under Title VII. St. Mary's Law Journal, 28, 269-327.
50. U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the workplace - Is it a problem? Washington, D.C.: Author.
51. Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom? Law and Human Behavior, this issue.
52. Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L. E., & Mannen, R. K. (1997, May). Gender differences in the evaluation of social-sexual conduct at work. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
53. Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L. E., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 711-794.
54. Wiener, R. L., Watts, B.A., Goldkamp, K. H., & Gasper, C. (1995). Social analytic investigation of hostile workplace environments: A test of the reasonable woman standard. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 263-281.